TY - JOUR
T1 - Moving further upstream
T2 - From toxics reduction to the precautionary principle
AU - Mayer, Brian
AU - Brown, Phil
AU - Linder, Meadow
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors thank Theo Luebke, Joshua Mandelbaum, Sabrina McCormick, and Stephen Zavestoski for their involvement in the larger project, of which this is one component. They thank Joel Tickner and Steve Kroll-Smith for comments on the manuscript. The authors are grateful to the staff of the Toxic Use Reduction Institute for granting us access to their work. This research is supported by grants to the second author from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation's Investigator Awards in Health Policy Research Program (Grant #036273) and the National Science Foundation Program in Social Dimensions of Engineering, Science, and Technology (Grant # SES-9975518).
Funding Information:
Proponents of the precautionary principle have focused considerable energy on children's health. Childhood is the most susceptible time for environmental agents to damage development, especially neurological development. 22 Also, children's slower metabolic rates leave the toxic agents in their bodies for longer periods of time. Relative to body weight, children are exposed to a greater amount of toxic materials than adults. Recent rises in asthma, developmental disorders, and cancer in children sparked renewed attention on children's environmental health, including the EPA's 1996 National Agenda to Protect Children's Health, the Food Quality Protection Act of 1996, and the 1997 Executive Order 13045 on Children's Environmental Health. The EPA, CDC, and the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences funded eight university-based centers for children's environmental health, and HUD's Healthy Homes project has supported many urban efforts. But, despite the number of bills and attention paid to children's health, most of the funding is directed toward screening and quantification of risk rather than to examining, banning, and restricting chemicals, or to alternative, substitutive production approaches. 23
PY - 2002
Y1 - 2002
N2 - Early policies to reduce the amount of toxic waste in the environment focused on cleaning up downstream sources of pollution, such as toxic disposal sites. Public attention in the 1980s encouraged both industry and government to develop an alternative to this command-and-control approach. This article describes the emergence of that alternative - pollution prevention - and its application in Massachusetts through the 1989 Toxics Use Reduction Act. Pollution prevention focuses on the sources of pollution, both metaphorically and physically, more upstream than its predecessors. The success of the Toxics Use Reduction Act in Massachusetts helped create an opportunity where an alternative pollution prevention paradigm could develop. That paradigm, the precautionary principle, is popular among environment activists because it focuses further upstream than pollution prevention by calling attention to the role the social construction of risk plays in decisions regarding the use of hazardous substances. The authors examine the evolution of the precautionary principle through an investigation of three major pathways in its development and expansion. The article concludes with a discussion of the increased potential for protecting public health and the environment afforded by this new perspective.
AB - Early policies to reduce the amount of toxic waste in the environment focused on cleaning up downstream sources of pollution, such as toxic disposal sites. Public attention in the 1980s encouraged both industry and government to develop an alternative to this command-and-control approach. This article describes the emergence of that alternative - pollution prevention - and its application in Massachusetts through the 1989 Toxics Use Reduction Act. Pollution prevention focuses on the sources of pollution, both metaphorically and physically, more upstream than its predecessors. The success of the Toxics Use Reduction Act in Massachusetts helped create an opportunity where an alternative pollution prevention paradigm could develop. That paradigm, the precautionary principle, is popular among environment activists because it focuses further upstream than pollution prevention by calling attention to the role the social construction of risk plays in decisions regarding the use of hazardous substances. The authors examine the evolution of the precautionary principle through an investigation of three major pathways in its development and expansion. The article concludes with a discussion of the increased potential for protecting public health and the environment afforded by this new perspective.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/0036879820
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/0036879820#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1016/S0033-3549(04)50202-9
DO - 10.1016/S0033-3549(04)50202-9
M3 - Review article
C2 - 12576537
AN - SCOPUS:0036879820
SN - 0033-3549
VL - 117
SP - 574
EP - 586
JO - Public Health Reports
JF - Public Health Reports
IS - 6
ER -