Moving ecological tree-ring big data forwards: Limitations, data integration, and multidisciplinarity

Rubén D. Manzanedo, Alana R.O. Chin, Ailene K. Ettinger, Neil Pederson, Kavya Pradhan, Christopher H. Guiterman, Jiajia Su, Frederik Baumgarten, Janneke Hille Ris Lambers

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review

Abstract

In recent years, tree-ring databases have emerged as a remarkable resource for ecological research, allowing us to address ecological questions at unprecedented temporal and spatial scales. However, concerns regarding big tree-ring data limitations and risks have also surfaced, leading to questions about their potential to be representative of long-term forest responses. Here, we highlight three paths of action to improve on tree-ring databases in ecology: 1) Implementing consistent bias analyses in large dendroecological databases and promoting community-driven data to address data limitations, 2) Encouraging the integration of tree-ring data with other ecological datasets, and 3) Promoting theory-driven, mechanistic dendroecological research. These issues are increasingly important for tackling pressing cross-disciplinary research questions. Finally, although we focus here on tree ring databases, these points apply broadly across many aggregative databases in ecology.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number177244
JournalScience of the Total Environment
Volume955
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 10 2024
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Big data
  • Data biases
  • Dendroecology
  • Ecology
  • Representativity
  • Tree-ring

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Engineering
  • Environmental Chemistry
  • Waste Management and Disposal
  • Pollution

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Moving ecological tree-ring big data forwards: Limitations, data integration, and multidisciplinarity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this