More tips: Communicating with institutional review boards over the course of your project

Donna J. Peterson; Daniel A. McDonald; Sherry C. Betts

More tips: Communicating with institutional review boards over the course of your project

Donna J. Peterson, Daniel A. McDonald, Sherry C. Betts

Pima County, Office of

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

Abstract

This article focuses on the continuing review process required by Institutional Review Boards. It is a follow-up to a series of recent articles designed to help Extension Professionals navigate the university IRB process. The authors present general guidelines for the continuing review process and offer some issues and tips for success.

Original language	English (US)
Article number	6TOT1
Pages (from-to)	251-256
Number of pages	6
Journal	Journal of Extension
Volume	43
Issue number	6
State	Published - Dec 2005

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Education

Cite this

@article{cdd7075bf7c840f081c70d9c0a26299d,

title = "More tips: Communicating with institutional review boards over the course of your project",

abstract = "This article focuses on the continuing review process required by Institutional Review Boards. It is a follow-up to a series of recent articles designed to help Extension Professionals navigate the university IRB process. The authors present general guidelines for the continuing review process and offer some issues and tips for success.",

author = "Peterson, {Donna J.} and McDonald, {Daniel A.} and Betts, {Sherry C.}",

year = "2005",

month = dec,

language = "English (US)",

volume = "43",

pages = "251--256",

journal = "Journal of Extension",

issn = "1077-5315",

publisher = "Extension Journal, Inc.",

number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - More tips

T2 - Communicating with institutional review boards over the course of your project

AU - Peterson, Donna J.

AU - McDonald, Daniel A.

AU - Betts, Sherry C.

PY - 2005/12

Y1 - 2005/12

N2 - This article focuses on the continuing review process required by Institutional Review Boards. It is a follow-up to a series of recent articles designed to help Extension Professionals navigate the university IRB process. The authors present general guidelines for the continuing review process and offer some issues and tips for success.

AB - This article focuses on the continuing review process required by Institutional Review Boards. It is a follow-up to a series of recent articles designed to help Extension Professionals navigate the university IRB process. The authors present general guidelines for the continuing review process and offer some issues and tips for success.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=29144534935&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=29144534935&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:29144534935

VL - 43

SP - 251

EP - 256

JO - Journal of Extension

JF - Journal of Extension

SN - 1077-5315

IS - 6

M1 - 6TOT1

ER -

More tips: Communicating with institutional review boards over the course of your project

Abstract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this