TY - JOUR
T1 - More Than Meets the Eye
T2 - How Oculometric Behaviors Evolve Over the Course of Automated Deception Detection Interactions
AU - Proudfoot, Jeffrey G.
AU - Jenkins, Jeffrey L.
AU - Burgoon, Judee K.
AU - Nunamaker, Jay F.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
PY - 2016/4/2
Y1 - 2016/4/2
N2 - Eye-tracking technology has exhibited promise for identifying deception in automated screening systems. Prior deception research using eye trackers has focused on the detection and interpretation of brief oculometric variations in response to stimuli (e.g., specific images or interview questions). However, more research is needed to understand how variations in oculometric behaviors evolve over the course of an interaction with a deception detection system. Using latent growth curve modeling, we tested hypotheses explaining how two oculometric behaviors—pupil dilation and eye-gaze fixation patterns—evolve over the course of a system interaction for three groups of participants: deceivers who see relevant stimuli (i.e., stimuli pertinent to their deception), deceivers who do not see relevant stimuli, and truth-tellers. The results indicate that the oculometric indicators of deceivers evolve differently over the course of an interaction, and that these trends are indicative of deception regardless of whether relevant stimuli are shown.
AB - Eye-tracking technology has exhibited promise for identifying deception in automated screening systems. Prior deception research using eye trackers has focused on the detection and interpretation of brief oculometric variations in response to stimuli (e.g., specific images or interview questions). However, more research is needed to understand how variations in oculometric behaviors evolve over the course of an interaction with a deception detection system. Using latent growth curve modeling, we tested hypotheses explaining how two oculometric behaviors—pupil dilation and eye-gaze fixation patterns—evolve over the course of a system interaction for three groups of participants: deceivers who see relevant stimuli (i.e., stimuli pertinent to their deception), deceivers who do not see relevant stimuli, and truth-tellers. The results indicate that the oculometric indicators of deceivers evolve differently over the course of an interaction, and that these trends are indicative of deception regardless of whether relevant stimuli are shown.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84990890076&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84990890076&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/07421222.2016.1205929
DO - 10.1080/07421222.2016.1205929
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84990890076
SN - 0742-1222
VL - 33
SP - 332
EP - 360
JO - Journal of Management Information Systems
JF - Journal of Management Information Systems
IS - 2
ER -