Abstract
To the Editor: The results of the prospective clinical trial of open-chest cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) reported by Geehr and his associates (May 1 issue)1 are important, but predictable from data on animals.1 2 3 Previously published clinical and animal studies have shown that open-chest CPR provides better hemodynamics than closed-chest compression.2 3 4 5 It remains uncertain, however, whether improvements in hemodynamics result in improved resuscitation and long-term survival. We approached this question in an animal model of cardiac arrest and found that after 15 minutes of closed-chest massage, open-chest CPR improved resuscitation, as compared with continued efforts by closed-chest techniques.2 However, there was no.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 968-969 |
| Number of pages | 2 |
| Journal | New England Journal of Medicine |
| Volume | 315 |
| Issue number | 15 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Oct 9 1986 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Medicine