Abstract
I argue that, according to ordinary morality, there is moral inertia, that is, moral pressure to fail to intervene in certain circumstances. Moral inertia is manifested in scenarios with a particular causal structure: deflection scenarios, where a threatening or benefiting process is diverted from a group of people to another. I explain why the deflection structure is essential for moral inertia to be manifested. I argue that there are two different manifestations of moral inertia: strict prohibitions on interventions, and constraints on interventions. Finally, I discuss the connection between moral inertia and the distinction between killing and letting die (or doing and allowing harm).
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 117-133 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| Journal | Philosophical Studies |
| Volume | 140 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jul 2008 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Causation
- Deflection
- Killing
- Letting die
- Malm
- Trolley
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Philosophy
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Moral inertia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS