Modelling projection effects in optically selected cluster catalogues

M. Costanzi, E. Rozo, E. S. Rykoff, A. Farahi, T. Jeltema, A. E. Evrard, A. Mantz, D. Gruen, R. Mandelbaum, J. DeRose, T. McClintock, T. N. Varga, Y. Zhang, J. Weller, R. H. Wechsler, M. Aguena

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

58 Scopus citations

Abstract

The cosmological utility of galaxy cluster catalogues is primarily limited by our ability to calibrate the relation between halo mass and observable mass proxies such as cluster richness, X-ray luminosity, or the Sunyaev-Zeldovich signal. Projection effects are a particularly pernicious systematic effect that can impact observable mass proxies; structure along the line of sight can both bias and increase the scatter of the observable mass proxies used in cluster abundance studies. In this work, we develop an empirical method to characterize the impact of projection effects on redMaPPer cluster catalogues. We use numerical simulations to validate our method and illustrate its robustness. We demonstrate that modelling of projection effects is a necessary component for cluster abundance studies capable of reaching ≈ 5 per cent mass calibration uncertainties (e.g. the Dark Energy Survey Year 1 sample). Specifically, ignoring the impact of projection effects in the observable-mass relation - i.e. marginalizing over a lognormal model only - biases the posterior probability of the cluster normalization condition S8 ≡ σ8m/0.3)1/2 by ΔS8 = 0.05, more than twice the uncertainty in the posterior for such an analysis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)490-505
Number of pages16
JournalMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Volume482
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Keywords

  • Galaxies: clusters: general
  • Large-scale structure of Universe

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
  • Space and Planetary Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Modelling projection effects in optically selected cluster catalogues'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this