TY - GEN
T1 - Modeling protocol offload for message-oriented communication
AU - Gilfeather, Patricia
AU - Maccabe, Arthur B.
PY - 2005
Y1 - 2005
N2 - In this paper, we present a new, conceptual model that captures the benefits of protocol offload in the context of high performance computing systems. In contrast to the LAWS model, the extensible message-oriented offload model (EMO) emphasizes communication in terms of messages rather than flows. In contrast to the LogP model, EMO emphasizes the performance of the network protocol rather than the parallel algorithm. The extensible messageoriented offload model allows protocol developers to consider the tradeoffs and specifics associated with offloading protocol processing including the reduction in message latency along with benefits associated with reduction in overhead and improvements to throughput. We give an overview of the EMO model and show how our model can be mapped to the LAWS and LogP models. We also show how it can be used to analyze individual messages within TCP flows by contrasting full offload (TCP offload engines) with other approaches, e.g., interrupt coalescing and splintered TCP.
AB - In this paper, we present a new, conceptual model that captures the benefits of protocol offload in the context of high performance computing systems. In contrast to the LAWS model, the extensible message-oriented offload model (EMO) emphasizes communication in terms of messages rather than flows. In contrast to the LogP model, EMO emphasizes the performance of the network protocol rather than the parallel algorithm. The extensible messageoriented offload model allows protocol developers to consider the tradeoffs and specifics associated with offloading protocol processing including the reduction in message latency along with benefits associated with reduction in overhead and improvements to throughput. We give an overview of the EMO model and show how our model can be mapped to the LAWS and LogP models. We also show how it can be used to analyze individual messages within TCP flows by contrasting full offload (TCP offload engines) with other approaches, e.g., interrupt coalescing and splintered TCP.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/50149087392
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/50149087392#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1109/CLUSTR.2005.347069
DO - 10.1109/CLUSTR.2005.347069
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:50149087392
SN - 0780394852
SN - 9780780394858
T3 - Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Cluster Computing, ICCC
BT - 2005 IEEE International Conference on Cluster Computing, CLUSTER
T2 - 2005 IEEE International Conference on Cluster Computing, CLUSTER
Y2 - 27 September 2005 through 30 September 2005
ER -