Mixing standard work and nonstandard deals: The consequences of heterogeneity in employment arrangements

Joseph P. Broschak, Alison Davis-Blake

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

159 Scopus citations

Abstract

We examined how proportions of individuals in standard and nonstandard work arrangements affected work group members' relationships with supervisors, social relations with coworkers, willingness to assist others, and intentions to leave their organization. Supporting Blalock's theory of majority-minority group relations, higher proportions of nonstandard workers were associated with less favorable attitudes toward supervisors and peers, increased turnover intentions, and decreased work-related helping behaviors. The consequences of heterogeneity in employment arrangements were contingent on (1) workers' locations in their firm's mobility system, (2) type of nonstandard arrangements, and (3) the amount and type of contact between standard and nonstandard workers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)371-393
Number of pages23
JournalAcademy of Management Journal
Volume49
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2006

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Business, Management and Accounting(all)
  • Strategy and Management
  • Management of Technology and Innovation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Mixing standard work and nonstandard deals: The consequences of heterogeneity in employment arrangements'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this