Mitochondrial DNA deletions serve as biomarkers of aging in the skin, but are typically absent in nonmelanoma skin cancers

Alex Eshaghian, Ruth A. Vleugels, Jeffrey A. Canter, Michel A. McDonald, Thomas Stasko, James E. Sligh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

84 Scopus citations


The potential role of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) deletions in nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) and in cutaneous photoaging was explored using a genetic approach. Tumors and photodamaged tumor-free "margin" skin were obtained from NMSC patients undergoing excision and the mtDNA from these specimens was screened for the presence of deletions using long extension PCR. mtDNA deletions were abundant in margin tissue specimens from older patients and their number correlated with the patient age. There was a statistically significant difference between the number of mtDNA deletions in tumors and margins. Fewer deletions were detected in the tumors than the margins and the tumors often had no deletions, implying a potential selection for full-length mtDNA or perhaps a protective role for mtDNA deletions in the process of tumorigenesis. The observed mtDNA deletions from skin were often unreported (19 of 21 deletions), but typically shared structural features with mtDNA deletions reported in other tissues. Some mtDNA deletions were detected from the skin of multiple individuals, including 3,715 and 6,278-base pair (bp) deletions, whose frequencies approached that of the previously well-characterized 4977-bp "common" deletion. These data support the use of mtDNA mutations as biomarkers of photoaging in the skin.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)336-344
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Investigative Dermatology
Issue number2
StatePublished - Feb 2006

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry
  • Molecular Biology
  • Dermatology
  • Cell Biology


Dive into the research topics of 'Mitochondrial DNA deletions serve as biomarkers of aging in the skin, but are typically absent in nonmelanoma skin cancers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this