Measuring engagement in eHealth and mHealth behavior change interventions: Viewpoint of methodologies

Camille E. Short, Ann DeSmet, Catherine Woods, Susan L. Williams, Carol Maher, Anouk Middelweerd, Andre Matthias Müller, Petra A. Wark, Corneel Vandelanotte, Louise Poppe, Melanie D. Hingle, Rik Crutzen

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

208 Scopus citations


Engagement in electronic health (eHealth) and mobile health (mHealth) behavior change interventions is thought to be important for intervention effectiveness, though what constitutes engagement and how it enhances efficacy has been somewhat unclear in the literature. Recently published detailed definitions and conceptual models of engagement have helped to build consensus around a definition of engagement and improve our understanding of how engagement may influence effectiveness. This work has helped to establish a clearer research agenda. However, to test the hypotheses generated by the conceptual modules, we need to know how to measure engagement in a valid and reliable way. The aim of this viewpoint is to provide an overview of engagement measurement options that can be employed in eHealth and mHealth behavior change intervention evaluations, discuss methodological considerations, and provide direction for future research. To identify measures, we used snowball sampling, starting from systematic reviews of engagement research as well as those utilized in studies known to the authors. A wide range of methods to measure engagement were identified, including qualitative measures, self-report questionnaires, ecological momentary assessments, system usage data, sensor data, social media data, and psychophysiological measures. Each measurement method is appraised and examples are provided to illustrate possible use in eHealth and mHealth behavior change research. Recommendations for future research are provided, based on the limitations of current methods and the heavy reliance on system usage data as the sole assessment of engagement. The validation and adoption of a wider range of engagement measurements and their thoughtful application to the study of engagement are encouraged.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere292
JournalJournal of medical Internet research
Issue number11
StatePublished - 2018


  • Evaluation studies
  • Health promotion
  • Internet
  • Outcome and process assessment (health care)
  • Telemedicine
  • Treatment adherence and compliance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Informatics


Dive into the research topics of 'Measuring engagement in eHealth and mHealth behavior change interventions: Viewpoint of methodologies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this