Abstract
Albert and Loewer[1] have recently clarified their earlier objection to the interactive interpretation presented in Healey[2]. They now charge that this interpretation fails to solve a problem of which the measurement problem is but a special case. The general problem is to reconcile quantum mechanics with the prima facie determinateness of such dynamical properties as the positions of macroscopic objects. In response I defend both the preeminent significance of determinate measurement outcomes and the claim that the models of Healey[3] go a long way toward securing their determinateness.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 307-316 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | Foundations of Physics Letters |
Volume | 6 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Aug 1993 |
Keywords
- determinateness problem
- errorprone measurement
- measurement problem
- quantum measurement
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Physics and Astronomy