Marketing Ideas: How to Write Research Articles that Readers Understand and Cite

Nooshin L. Warren, Matthew Farmer, Tianyu Gu, Caleb Warren

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

Academia is a marketplace of ideas. Just as firms market their products with packaging and advertising, scholars market their ideas with writing. Even the best ideas will make an impact only if others understand and build on them. Why, then, is academic writing often difficult to understand? In two experiments and a text analysis of 1,640 articles in premier marketing journals, this research shows that scholars write unclearly in part because they forget that they know more about their research than readers, a phenomenon called “the curse of knowledge.” Knowledge, or familiarity with one’s own research, exacerbates three practices that make academic writing difficult to understand: abstraction, technical language, and passive writing. When marketing scholars know more about a research project, they use more abstract, technical, and passive writing to describe it. Articles with more abstract, technical, and passive writing are harder for readers to understand and are less likely to be cited. The authors call for scholars to overcome the curse of knowledge and provide two tools—a website (writingclaritycalculator.com) and a tutorial—to help them recognize and repair unclear writing so they can write articles that are more likely to make an impact.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)42-57
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of marketing
Volume85
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2021

Keywords

  • citations
  • methods
  • readability
  • relevance
  • text analysis
  • writing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Marketing

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Marketing Ideas: How to Write Research Articles that Readers Understand and Cite'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this