TY - JOUR
T1 - Market and Nonmarket Pathways to Home Ownership and Social Stratification in Hybrid Housing Regimes
T2 - Evidence from Four Post-Soviet Countries
AU - Gerber, Theodore P.
AU - Wang, Jia
AU - Zavisca, Jane R.
N1 - Funding Information:
and the U.S. Army Research Office via the Minerva Research Initiative program under grant W911NF1310303 and support for the collection of the Survey of Housing Experiences in Russia (SHER) data from the National Science Foundation under grant 112409. The views reported herein are not the views of the U.S. Army or U.S. government. The article benefited from helpful comments from the AJS reviewers and from participants at the 2019 RC28 conference in Frankfurt (Germany) and seminars at Columbia University, Tallinn University (Estonia), Peking University (China), and Nazarbaev University (Kazakhstan). Please direct correspondence to Professor Theodore P. Gerber, 1180 Observatory Drive, Madison, Wisconsin 53706. E-mail: [email protected]
Funding Information:
1 The authors acknowledge financial support for collection of the Comparative Housing Experiences and Social Stability (CHESS) data from the U.S. Army Research Laboratory
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The University of Chicago.
PY - 2022/11
Y1 - 2022/11
N2 - Sociological research on housing inequality overlooks how the predic-tors and benefits of home ownership vary by pathway to ownership. The market pathway (purchase) is more associated with ascribed and achieved status characteristics linked to income and with higher housing satisfaction, greater subjective housing-related autonomy, and better housing quality. Nonmarket pathways (primarily, transfers from relatives or the state) are related to the longevity of parents and (in more patriarchal countries) gender. Such variations in the stratifying role of home ownership are theoretically derived and empirically confirmed in analyses of Russia, Azerbaijan, Ukraine, and Kyrgyzstan, where privatization of state-owned housing produced hybrid housing regimes fea-turing widespread private ownership but limited market purchases. These case studies foreground pathways to ownership as an important source of heterogeneity, relate aspects of well-being other than wealth to home ownership, and highlight market allocation as a key mechanism linking home ownership to other dimensions of inequality.
AB - Sociological research on housing inequality overlooks how the predic-tors and benefits of home ownership vary by pathway to ownership. The market pathway (purchase) is more associated with ascribed and achieved status characteristics linked to income and with higher housing satisfaction, greater subjective housing-related autonomy, and better housing quality. Nonmarket pathways (primarily, transfers from relatives or the state) are related to the longevity of parents and (in more patriarchal countries) gender. Such variations in the stratifying role of home ownership are theoretically derived and empirically confirmed in analyses of Russia, Azerbaijan, Ukraine, and Kyrgyzstan, where privatization of state-owned housing produced hybrid housing regimes fea-turing widespread private ownership but limited market purchases. These case studies foreground pathways to ownership as an important source of heterogeneity, relate aspects of well-being other than wealth to home ownership, and highlight market allocation as a key mechanism linking home ownership to other dimensions of inequality.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85147454301&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85147454301&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1086/722927
DO - 10.1086/722927
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85147454301
SN - 0002-9602
VL - 128
SP - 866
EP - 913
JO - American Journal of Sociology
JF - American Journal of Sociology
IS - 3
ER -