TY - JOUR
T1 - Management strategies for trace organic chemicals in water – A review of international approaches
AU - Bieber, Stefan
AU - Snyder, Shane A.
AU - Dagnino, Sonia
AU - Rauch-Williams, Tanja
AU - Drewes, Jörg E.
N1 - Funding Information:
The applicability of advanced wastewater treatment processes for the reduction of TOrC from point sources such as wastewater was investigated and two technologies, namely ozonation and powdered activated carbon, showed the best applicability and compound removal characteristics for a shortlist of indicator chemicals in numerous pilot- and full-scale studies for the conditions in Switzerland. Both technologies were able to achieve an overall removal of at least 80% of these specified TOrC indicators. Other technologies, like advanced oxidation processes (AOP) or membrane technologies were considered as well, but not found to be suitable at the time. However, investigating alternative treatment processes is encouraged by the overall program. The subsequent legislative process involving the public and all stakeholders resulted in a broadly supported adoption of the Swiss Water Protection Act in 2014, which came into effect in January 2016 ( Federal Assembly of the Swiss Confederation, 2016 ). This legislation requires the nationwide implementation of advanced wastewater treatment processes in WWTPs serving more than 80,000 people equivalents, plants discharging to surface water used for the abstraction of drinking water, and WWTPs contributing more than 10% of the total flow to a receiving stream ( Eggen et al., 2014 ). This upgrading program will include approximately 100 of the total of 759 Swiss wastewater treatment plants by 2040. The program is funded by a national fund (75% of total costs) and fees paid by wastewater producers (polluter-pays principle) ( BAFU, 2012 ).
Funding Information:
We would like to acknowledge the Water Research Foundation (Denver, CO, USA) for funding this research project ( WRF #4494 ). The authors would like to thank Markus Busch, Terry Branch, Tom Carpenter, Claudia Castell-Exner, John Consolvo, Joe Cotruvo, Jason Dadakis, Nancy Denslow, Sarah Deslauriers, Eric Dickenson, Alice Fulmer, Emily Gilbert, Caitlin Glover, Urs von Gunten, Giorgia Greco, Bob Hulquist, Stuart Khan, Marion Letzel, Thomas Letzel, David Lipsky, Barbara Losey, Robert Loos, Ruth Marfil-Vega, Robert McConnell, Werner Reifenhäuser, Peter Stoks, and Peter Tennant for their contributions to the research project and their participation in the workshops.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2018/3
Y1 - 2018/3
N2 - To ensure an appropriate management of potential health risks and uncertainties from the release of trace organic chemicals (TOrCs) into the aqueous environment, many countries have evaluated and implemented strategies to manage TOrCs. The aim of this study was to evaluate existing management strategies for TOrCs in different countries to derive and compare underlying core principles and paradigms and to develop suggestions for more holistic management strategies to protect the environment and drinking water supplies from the discharge of undesired TOrCs. The strategies in different industrial countries were summarized and subsequently compared with regards to three particular questions: 1) Do the approaches different countries have implemented manage all or only specific portions of the universe of chemicals; 2) What implementation and compliance strategies are used to manage aquatic and human health risk and what are their pros and cons; and 3) How are site-specific watershed differences being addressed? While management strategies of the different countries target similar TOrCs, the programs differ in several important aspects, including underlying principles, the balance between aquatic or human health protection, implementation methods, and financing mechanisms used to fund regulatory programs.
AB - To ensure an appropriate management of potential health risks and uncertainties from the release of trace organic chemicals (TOrCs) into the aqueous environment, many countries have evaluated and implemented strategies to manage TOrCs. The aim of this study was to evaluate existing management strategies for TOrCs in different countries to derive and compare underlying core principles and paradigms and to develop suggestions for more holistic management strategies to protect the environment and drinking water supplies from the discharge of undesired TOrCs. The strategies in different industrial countries were summarized and subsequently compared with regards to three particular questions: 1) Do the approaches different countries have implemented manage all or only specific portions of the universe of chemicals; 2) What implementation and compliance strategies are used to manage aquatic and human health risk and what are their pros and cons; and 3) How are site-specific watershed differences being addressed? While management strategies of the different countries target similar TOrCs, the programs differ in several important aspects, including underlying principles, the balance between aquatic or human health protection, implementation methods, and financing mechanisms used to fund regulatory programs.
KW - Chemicals of emerging concern
KW - Environmental health
KW - Human health
KW - Management strategies
KW - Trace organic chemicals
KW - Water regulations
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85038971024&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85038971024&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.12.100
DO - 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.12.100
M3 - Review article
C2 - 29274580
AN - SCOPUS:85038971024
VL - 195
SP - 410
EP - 426
JO - Chemosphere
JF - Chemosphere
SN - 0045-6535
ER -