TY - JOUR
T1 - Management of Patients with Predicted Difficult Airways in an Academic Emergency Department
AU - Sakles, John C.
AU - Douglas, Matthew J.K.
AU - Hypes, Cameron D.
AU - Patanwala, Asad E.
AU - Mosier, Jarrod M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2017/8
Y1 - 2017/8
N2 - Background Patients with difficult airways are sometimes encountered in the emergency department (ED), however, there is a little data available regarding their management. Objectives To determine the incidence, management, and outcomes of patients with predicted difficult airways in the ED. Methods Over the 1-year period from July 1, 2015 to June 30, 2016, data were prospectively collected on all patients intubated in an academic ED. After each intubation, the operator completed an airway management data form. Operators performed a pre-intubation difficult airway assessment and classified patients into routine, challenging, or difficult airways. All non-arrest patients were included in the study. Results There were 456 patients that met inclusion criteria. Fifty (11%) had predicted difficult airways. In these 50 patients, neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) were used in 40 (80%), an awake intubation technique with light sedation was used in 7 (14%), and no medications were used in 3 (6%). In the 40 difficult airway patients who underwent NMBA facilitated intubation, a video laryngoscope (GlideScope 21, Verathon, Bothell, WA and C-MAC 19, Karl Storz, Tuttlingen, Germany) was used in each of these, with a first-pass success of 90%. In the 7 patients who underwent awake intubation, a video laryngoscope was used in 5, and a flexible fiberoptic scope was used in 2. Ketamine was used in 6 of the awake intubations. None of these difficult airway patients required rescue with a surgical airway. Conclusions Difficult airways were predicted in 11% of non-arrest patients requiring intubation in the ED, the majority of which were managed using an NMBA and a video laryngoscope with a high first-pass success.
AB - Background Patients with difficult airways are sometimes encountered in the emergency department (ED), however, there is a little data available regarding their management. Objectives To determine the incidence, management, and outcomes of patients with predicted difficult airways in the ED. Methods Over the 1-year period from July 1, 2015 to June 30, 2016, data were prospectively collected on all patients intubated in an academic ED. After each intubation, the operator completed an airway management data form. Operators performed a pre-intubation difficult airway assessment and classified patients into routine, challenging, or difficult airways. All non-arrest patients were included in the study. Results There were 456 patients that met inclusion criteria. Fifty (11%) had predicted difficult airways. In these 50 patients, neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) were used in 40 (80%), an awake intubation technique with light sedation was used in 7 (14%), and no medications were used in 3 (6%). In the 40 difficult airway patients who underwent NMBA facilitated intubation, a video laryngoscope (GlideScope 21, Verathon, Bothell, WA and C-MAC 19, Karl Storz, Tuttlingen, Germany) was used in each of these, with a first-pass success of 90%. In the 7 patients who underwent awake intubation, a video laryngoscope was used in 5, and a flexible fiberoptic scope was used in 2. Ketamine was used in 6 of the awake intubations. None of these difficult airway patients required rescue with a surgical airway. Conclusions Difficult airways were predicted in 11% of non-arrest patients requiring intubation in the ED, the majority of which were managed using an NMBA and a video laryngoscope with a high first-pass success.
KW - airway management
KW - difficult airway
KW - emergency department
KW - intubation
KW - tracheal intubation
KW - video laryngoscopy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85020461776&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85020461776&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jemermed.2017.04.003
DO - 10.1016/j.jemermed.2017.04.003
M3 - Article
C2 - 28606617
AN - SCOPUS:85020461776
SN - 0736-4679
VL - 53
SP - 163
EP - 171
JO - Journal of Emergency Medicine
JF - Journal of Emergency Medicine
IS - 2
ER -