MANAGED CARE: RATIONING WITHOUT JUSTICE, BUT NOT UNJUSTLY

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Three ethical criticisms of managed care are often voiced: (1) by skimming the cream of the patient population, managed care organizations fail to discharge their obligations to improve access, or at least, to not worsen it; (2) managed care organizations engage in rationing, thereby depriving patients of care to which they are entitled; and (3) by pressuring physicians to ration care, managed care organizations interfere with physicians fulfillment of their fi duciary obligations to provide the best care for each patient. This article argues that each of these criticisms is misconceived.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationJustice and Health Care
Subtitle of host publicationSelected Essays
PublisherOxford University Press
Pages141-155
Number of pages15
ISBN (Electronic)9780197730652
ISBN (Print)9780195394061
StatePublished - Jan 1 2023
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Medicine
  • General Arts and Humanities
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'MANAGED CARE: RATIONING WITHOUT JUSTICE, BUT NOT UNJUSTLY'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this