Abstract
Coronary bifurcation lesion intervention is technically challenging with higher complication rates. Many coronary interventional trials have been conducted involving coronary bifurcation lesions in order to compare one-stent with two-stent techniques. However, these trials have major limitation by enrolling all bifurcation lesions, including low-risk lesions so-called not true bifurcation lesions. This manuscript discusses the importance of appropriate designing of clinical trials for evaluation of complex techniques in coronary bifurcation lesions.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 295-301 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | Journal of Interventional Cardiology |
| Volume | 24 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Aug 2011 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Major limitations of randomized clinical trials involving coronary artery bifurcation interventions: Time for redesigning clinical trials by involving only true bifurcation lesions and using appropriate bifurcation classification'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS