TY - JOUR
T1 - Mainstreaming investments in watershed services to enhance water security
T2 - Barriers and opportunities
AU - Vogl, Adrian L.
AU - Goldstein, Joshua H.
AU - Daily, Gretchen C.
AU - Vira, Bhaskar
AU - Bremer, Leah
AU - McDonald, Robert I.
AU - Shemie, Daniel
AU - Tellman, Beth
AU - Cassin, Jan
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2017/9
Y1 - 2017/9
N2 - Watersheds are under increasing pressure worldwide, as expanding human activities coupled with global climate change threaten the water security of people downstream. In response, some communities have initiated investments in watershed services (IWS), a general term for policy-finance mechanisms that mitigate diverse watershed threats and promote ecosystem-based adaptation. Here, we explore the potential for increasing the uptake and impact of IWS, evaluating what limits its application and how institutional, financial, and informational barriers can be overcome. Our analysis complements the growing literature on individual programs by identifying levers at regional and global scales. We conclude that mainstreaming IWS as a cost-effective strategy alongside engineered approaches will require advances that (i) lower institutional barriers to implementation and participation in IWS; (ii) introduce structural market changes and standards of practice that account for the value of watersheds’ natural capital; (iii) develop practical tools and metrics of IWS costs and benefits; and (iv) share success stories of replicable institutional and financial models applied in varied contexts.
AB - Watersheds are under increasing pressure worldwide, as expanding human activities coupled with global climate change threaten the water security of people downstream. In response, some communities have initiated investments in watershed services (IWS), a general term for policy-finance mechanisms that mitigate diverse watershed threats and promote ecosystem-based adaptation. Here, we explore the potential for increasing the uptake and impact of IWS, evaluating what limits its application and how institutional, financial, and informational barriers can be overcome. Our analysis complements the growing literature on individual programs by identifying levers at regional and global scales. We conclude that mainstreaming IWS as a cost-effective strategy alongside engineered approaches will require advances that (i) lower institutional barriers to implementation and participation in IWS; (ii) introduce structural market changes and standards of practice that account for the value of watersheds’ natural capital; (iii) develop practical tools and metrics of IWS costs and benefits; and (iv) share success stories of replicable institutional and financial models applied in varied contexts.
KW - Ecosystem-based adaptation
KW - Enabling conditions
KW - Investments in watershed services
KW - Natural infrastructure
KW - Return-on-investment
KW - Water infrastructure
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85019684423&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85019684423&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.05.007
DO - 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.05.007
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85019684423
VL - 75
SP - 19
EP - 27
JO - Environmental Science and Policy
JF - Environmental Science and Policy
SN - 1462-9011
ER -