Lymphatic versus nonlymphatic fluid absorption from the peritoneal cavity as related to the peritoneal ultrafiltration capacity and sieving properties

Bengt Rippe, El Rasheid Zakaria

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

17 Scopus citations

Abstract

In this article we discuss the role of capillary fluid absorption via Starling mechanisms (the transcapillary hydrostatic pressure gradient opposed by the colloid osmotic pressure gradient as multiplied by the capillary UF coefficient) vs. lymphatic fluid absorption as determinants of the total fluid loss from the peritoneal cavity during continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). We also mention that, under nonstcady state conditions. there is in addition some net absorption of fluid into the interstitium of tissues surrounding the peritoneal cavity. Support for the contention that nonlymphatic fluid absorption directly into the capillaries is the major mode of fluid transport from the peritoneal cavity to the blood is given by measurements of the pcritoneal-to-blood clearance of tracer albumin (or other proteins). Such measurements yield clearance values of the order of 0.2-0.3 ml/min in CAPD. This represents only about 20% of the total peritoneal fluid loss rate (1.2-1.3 ml/min) in ordinary’ CAPD dwells. Indirect support for a relatively low lymph flow is also derived from capillary physiology. Like continuous capillary walls, the peritoneal membrane shows a bimodal selectivity towards molecules of graded molecular size. Thus, small solute transport can be described as occurring by diffusion through numerous ‘small’ (~ 50 Å radius) pores, whereas large solute transport is consistent with blood-peritoneal convection through smaller numbers of ‘large’ (radius ~ 250 Å) pores. Furthermore, peritoneal sieving data are compatible with the notion that large crystalloid osmotic pressure gradients cause fluid flow through a water-exclusive (‘ultra-small’ pore) pathway. A three-pore model of peritoneal selectivity can explain why small solute sieving coefficients arc only 0.5-0.6, even though small solute reflection coefficients are close to zero. Another important implication of the three-pore concept is that the peritoneal UF- coefficient is much higher than previously thought, emphasizing the role of capillary absorption in the fluid loss from the peritoneal cavity in CAPD. It is concluded that fluid loss from the peritoneal cavity is dominated by capillary fluid absorption. Hence, lymphatic absorption accounts for just a small fraction of the peri-toncal-to-blood absorption of fluid in peritoneal dialysis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)189-202
Number of pages14
JournalBlood Purification
Volume10
Issue number3-4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1992
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Capillary permeability
  • Osmotic reflection coefficients
  • Peritoneal dialysis
  • Peritoneal lymphatic absorption
  • Starling forces
  • Ultrafiltration coefficient

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Hematology
  • Nephrology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Lymphatic versus nonlymphatic fluid absorption from the peritoneal cavity as related to the peritoneal ultrafiltration capacity and sieving properties'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this