Abstract
Recently, philosophers have drawn on tools from game theory to explore behavior in Hobbes’ state of nature (Vanderschraaf in Econ Philos 22:243–279, 2006; Chung in J Am Philos Assoc 1:485–508, 2015). I take a similar approach and argue the Lockean state of nature is best conceived of as a conflictual coordination game.I also discuss Nozick’s famous claim regarding the emergence of the state and argue the path to the minimal state is blocked by a hitherto unnoticed free-rider problem. Finally, I argue that on my representation of the Lockean state of nature both widespread conflict and lasting peace are possible. This, I contend, is in line with one popular interpretation of Locke (Simmons in Polit Theory 17:449–470, 1989).
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 705-726 |
| Number of pages | 22 |
| Journal | Philosophical Studies |
| Volume | 177 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Mar 1 2020 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Game theory
- John Locke
- Robert Nozick
- Social contract
- State of nature
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Philosophy