TY - JOUR
T1 - Likelihood ratio, optimal decision rules, and relationship between proportion correct and d' in the dual-pair AB-versus-BA identification paradigm
AU - Micheyl, Christophe
AU - Dai, Huanping
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health—National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders Grant R01 DC 05216, as well as by the University of Arizona.
PY - 2009/8
Y1 - 2009/8
N2 - The equal-variance Gaussian signal detection theory (SDT) decision model for the dual-pair (4IAX) change-detection paradigm has been described in earlier publications. In this research article, we consider the equal-variance Gaussian SDT model for the related 4IAX AB-versus-BA identification paradigm. The likelihood ratios, optimal decision rules, receiver-operating characteristics (ROCs), and relationships between d' and proportion correct (PC) are analyzed for two special cases: that of statistically independent observations, which typically applies in constant-stimuli experiments, and that of highly correlated observations, which typically applies in experiments where stimuli are roved widely across trials or pairs. A surprising outcome of this analysis is that, although these two situations lead to different optimal decision rules, the predicted ROCs and PC responses for these two cases are not substantially different and are either identical to or similar to those observed in the basic yes-no paradigm. Supplemental materials for this study can be downloaded from app.psychonomic-journals.org/content/supplemental.
AB - The equal-variance Gaussian signal detection theory (SDT) decision model for the dual-pair (4IAX) change-detection paradigm has been described in earlier publications. In this research article, we consider the equal-variance Gaussian SDT model for the related 4IAX AB-versus-BA identification paradigm. The likelihood ratios, optimal decision rules, receiver-operating characteristics (ROCs), and relationships between d' and proportion correct (PC) are analyzed for two special cases: that of statistically independent observations, which typically applies in constant-stimuli experiments, and that of highly correlated observations, which typically applies in experiments where stimuli are roved widely across trials or pairs. A surprising outcome of this analysis is that, although these two situations lead to different optimal decision rules, the predicted ROCs and PC responses for these two cases are not substantially different and are either identical to or similar to those observed in the basic yes-no paradigm. Supplemental materials for this study can be downloaded from app.psychonomic-journals.org/content/supplemental.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70349506356&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70349506356&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3758/APP.71.6.1426
DO - 10.3758/APP.71.6.1426
M3 - Article
C2 - 19633356
AN - SCOPUS:70349506356
SN - 1943-3921
VL - 71
SP - 1426
EP - 1433
JO - Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics
JF - Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics
IS - 6
ER -