TY - JOUR
T1 - Legislatures and Political Stability
T2 - An Exploratory Analysis
AU - Mishler, William
N1 - Funding Information:
Research for this note was funded in part by a grant from the American Political Science Association. I am indebted to Rosendo Fraga, Silvia Giavedonni, Carlos Giori, William J. McGuire, Héctor Palomino, Rebeca Rumayor-Alfonso, the LARR editors, and three anonymous LARR reviewers for a variety of useful contributions. A Ford Foundation Undergraduate Research Fellowship helped support the research assistance of Rebeca Rumayor-Alfonso.
PY - 1984/2
Y1 - 1984/2
N2 - Although most legislatures do not play significant roles in the lawmaking, policy, or resource allocation processes, their durability and resilience as institutions are widely assumed to be consequences of the contributions they make to the maintenance of political order and stability. Even token legislatures and those dominated by authoritarian regimes frequently are credited with promoting stability by providing forums for symbolic representation and ritualistic dissent. However, analyses of the relationships among legislature structure, political stability, and the legislative environment across more than 100 countries demonstrate that the capacities of legislatures to promote stability are strictly limited, hinge substantially upon their representativeness and effectiveness in policymaking and resource allocation, and are easily overwhelmed where societal cleavages are severe, resources are limited, or complementary democratic institutions are lacking. Genuinely effective and responsive legislatures enhance the stability of democratic regimes, but token legislatures and legislatures in authoritarian regimes have little impact on stability and may even exacerbate political disorder and violence.
AB - Although most legislatures do not play significant roles in the lawmaking, policy, or resource allocation processes, their durability and resilience as institutions are widely assumed to be consequences of the contributions they make to the maintenance of political order and stability. Even token legislatures and those dominated by authoritarian regimes frequently are credited with promoting stability by providing forums for symbolic representation and ritualistic dissent. However, analyses of the relationships among legislature structure, political stability, and the legislative environment across more than 100 countries demonstrate that the capacities of legislatures to promote stability are strictly limited, hinge substantially upon their representativeness and effectiveness in policymaking and resource allocation, and are easily overwhelmed where societal cleavages are severe, resources are limited, or complementary democratic institutions are lacking. Genuinely effective and responsive legislatures enhance the stability of democratic regimes, but token legislatures and legislatures in authoritarian regimes have little impact on stability and may even exacerbate political disorder and violence.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84974239086&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84974239086&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2307/2130433
DO - 10.2307/2130433
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84974239086
SN - 0022-3816
VL - 46
SP - 25
EP - 59
JO - The Journal of Politics
JF - The Journal of Politics
IS - 1
ER -