TY - JOUR
T1 - Laparoscopy-assisted and open living donor right hepatectomy
T2 - A comparative study of outcomes
AU - Baker, Talia B.
AU - Jay, Colleen L.
AU - Ladner, Daniela P.
AU - Preczewski, Luke B.
AU - Clark, Lori
AU - Holl, Jane
AU - Abecassis, Michael M.
N1 - Funding Information:
Research for this paper was done in part while C.L.J. was a National Research Service Award postdoctoral fellow with the Division of Organ Transplantation at Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine under an institutional award from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases 5 T32 DK077662-02 (PI: Michael Abecassis, MD, MBA).
PY - 2009/10
Y1 - 2009/10
N2 - Background: Minimally invasive liver surgery is a rapidly advancing field with demonstrated applicability to living donation. In this paper, we compare the safety and efficacy of laparoscopy-assisted donor right hepatectomy (LADRH) to open donor right hepatectomy (ODRH). Methods: We performed a retrospective, comparative analysis of 33 LADRH to the most recent 33 ODRH performed at our institution, evaluating donor complications, costs, and recipient outcomes. Results: Donor demographics including age, gender, body mass index (BMI), and vascular and biliary anomalies were comparable. Donor complication rates were equivalent for LADRH and ODRH. Donor operative times were shorter for LADRH (LADRH 265 minutes, ODRH 316; P < .001) even after adjusting for BMI. Blood loss and length of stay were comparable. Additionally, total hospitalization costs were equivalent (LADRH $1.11, ODRH $1.00; P = .19). Higher operative supply costs for LADRH were balanced by higher time-based operative costs for ODRH resulting in no significant differences in total operative costs. Finally, there were no differences in graft size, recipient patient or graft survival, or recipient vascular or biliary complications. Conclusion: Our experience suggests that LADRH compares favorably with ODRH with equivalent safety, resource utilization, and effectiveness. We believe that LADRH provides potential physical and psychological benefits without an adverse effect on outcomes.
AB - Background: Minimally invasive liver surgery is a rapidly advancing field with demonstrated applicability to living donation. In this paper, we compare the safety and efficacy of laparoscopy-assisted donor right hepatectomy (LADRH) to open donor right hepatectomy (ODRH). Methods: We performed a retrospective, comparative analysis of 33 LADRH to the most recent 33 ODRH performed at our institution, evaluating donor complications, costs, and recipient outcomes. Results: Donor demographics including age, gender, body mass index (BMI), and vascular and biliary anomalies were comparable. Donor complication rates were equivalent for LADRH and ODRH. Donor operative times were shorter for LADRH (LADRH 265 minutes, ODRH 316; P < .001) even after adjusting for BMI. Blood loss and length of stay were comparable. Additionally, total hospitalization costs were equivalent (LADRH $1.11, ODRH $1.00; P = .19). Higher operative supply costs for LADRH were balanced by higher time-based operative costs for ODRH resulting in no significant differences in total operative costs. Finally, there were no differences in graft size, recipient patient or graft survival, or recipient vascular or biliary complications. Conclusion: Our experience suggests that LADRH compares favorably with ODRH with equivalent safety, resource utilization, and effectiveness. We believe that LADRH provides potential physical and psychological benefits without an adverse effect on outcomes.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70349321278&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70349321278&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.surg.2009.05.022
DO - 10.1016/j.surg.2009.05.022
M3 - Article
C2 - 19789043
AN - SCOPUS:70349321278
SN - 0039-6060
VL - 146
SP - 817
EP - 825
JO - Surgery
JF - Surgery
IS - 4
ER -