Abstract
To the Editor: In their letter of May 9, Clayman et al.* report the first laparoscopic nephrectomy. They state that a minimally invasive approach was justifiable because the patient was elderly. Their procedure had an operative time of seven hours and required a 1-unit transfusion and a six-day inpatient hospital stay. In addition, the patient was subjected to possible tumor dissemination. A traditional nephrectomy would probably have had less morbidity. The advanced age of a patient should not be used as an excuse to substitute a glamorous experimental procedure when there is a safe, acceptable, tried and true alternative.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1110-1111 |
| Number of pages | 2 |
| Journal | New England Journal of Medicine |
| Volume | 325 |
| Issue number | 15 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Oct 10 1991 |
| Externally published | Yes |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Medicine
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Laparoscopic nephrectomy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS