Language architecture and its import for evolution

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review

16 Scopus citations

Abstract

Inquiry into the evolution of some biological system evidently can proceed only as far as its nature is understood. Lacking such understanding, its manifestations are likely to appear to be chaotic, highly variable, and lacking significant general properties; and, accordingly, study of its evolution cannot be seriously undertaken. These truisms hold of the study of the human faculty of language FL just as for other biological systems. As discussed below, FL appears to be a shared human capacity in essentials, with options of variation of a kind to which we return. After a long lapse, the problem of evolution of language arose in mid-twentieth century when the first efforts were made to construct accounts of FL as a biological object, internal to an individual, with particular internal languages – I-languages in current terminology – as manifestations of FL.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)295-300
Number of pages6
JournalNeuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
Volume81
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2017
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Biolinguistics program
  • Faculty of language
  • Merge
  • Universal grammar

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Language architecture and its import for evolution'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this