Lactated Ringer's solution resuscitation causes neutrophil activation after hemorrhagic shock

P. Rhee, D. Burris, C. Kaufmann, M. Pikoulis, B. Austin, G. Ling, D. Harviel, K. Waxman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

193 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the degree of neutrophil activation caused by hemorrhagic shock and resuscitation. Methods: Awake swine underwent 15- minute 40% blood volume hemorrhage, and a 1-hour shock period, followed by resuscitation with: group I, lactated Ringer's solution (LR); group II, shed blood; and group III, 7.5% hypertonic saline (HTS). Group IV underwent sham hemorrhage and LR infusion. Neutrophil activation was measured in whole blood using flow cytometry to detect intracellular superoxide burst activity. Results: Neutrophil activation increased significantly immediately after hemorrhage, but it was greatest after resuscitation with LR (group 1, 273 vs. 102%; p < 0.05). Animals that received shed blood (group II) and HTS (group III) had neutrophil activity return to baseline state after resuscitation. Group IV animals had an increase in neutrophil activation (259 vs. 129%; p < 0.05). Conclusion: Neutrophil activation occurring after LR resuscitation and LR infusion without hemorrhage, but not after resuscitation with shed blood or HTS, suggests that the neutrophil activation may be caused by LR and not by reperfusion.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)313-319
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care
Volume44
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1998
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Activation
  • Flow cytometry
  • Hemorrhage
  • Hypertonic saline
  • Lactated Ringer's solution
  • Neutrophils
  • Resuscitation
  • Shock
  • Swine

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Lactated Ringer's solution resuscitation causes neutrophil activation after hemorrhagic shock'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this