Knowledge is not power: Learning in polycentric governance systems

Pamela Rittelmeyer, Mark Lubell, Meredith Hovis, Tanya Heikkila, Andrea Gerlak, Tara Pozzi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The link between knowledge and decision-making in polycentric systems is shaped by the process of collective learning, where policy actors participate in multiple policy forums to acquire, translate, and disseminate knowledge. This article argues that the relationship between learning and participation in polycentric systems differs for actors with executive responsibilities versus specialized staff. Using a mix of quantitative and qualitative data, we show that executive staff are less likely to learn because of their incentives, resources, and position in the system. In contrast, specialized staff are more likely to learn as they form epistemic communities focused on specific policy issues. The different learning experiences of executive versus technical staff contributes to the disjunction between knowledge and power that is a feature of all polycentric systems. Bridging this gap requires institutional arrangements and training to enable the development of trust-based relationships between decision-makers, scientists, and other types of specialized knowledge communities.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalReview of Policy Research
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2024

Keywords

  • adaptive management
  • epistemic communities
  • learning
  • polycentricity
  • science-policy interface

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Public Administration
  • Political Science and International Relations
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Knowledge is not power: Learning in polycentric governance systems'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this