TY - JOUR
T1 - Is frequent sighing an indicator of dispositional negative emotionality? A multi-sample, multi-measure naturalistic-observation study
AU - Danvers, Alexander F.
AU - Milek, Anne
AU - Tackman, Allison M.
AU - Kaplan, Deanna M.
AU - Robbins, Megan L.
AU - Poslinelli, Angelina
AU - Moseley, Suzanne
AU - Raison, Charles L.
AU - Sbarra, David
AU - Mehl, Matthias R.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2021/2
Y1 - 2021/2
N2 - Sighing is a common nonverbal everyday behavior thought to signal the experiencing of negative emotions. Prior research from a small-scale study suggests that observed daily expressions of sighing is associated with subclinical depression (Robbins, Mehl, Holleran, & Kasle, 2011). This paper replicates and extends these findings, hypothesizing that individual differences in negative emotionality are associated with frequency of spontaneous sighing. Study 1 (N = 320) documents a strong lay assumption that frequent sighing signals dispositional negative emotionality. Study 2 estimates the actual association between daily sighing, assessed naturalistically using the Electronically Activated Recorder (EAR), and negative emotionality in a large, diverse, pooled sample (N = 469). Bayesian tests across six measures (neuroticism, depression, anxiety, stress, fatigue, loneliness) strongly support the null model. Together, results suggest the common intuition that people who sigh frequently experience more negative emotionality is inaccurate. Assessing whether an individual sighs more (or less) than others cannot be used to infer that they experience more negative emotions.
AB - Sighing is a common nonverbal everyday behavior thought to signal the experiencing of negative emotions. Prior research from a small-scale study suggests that observed daily expressions of sighing is associated with subclinical depression (Robbins, Mehl, Holleran, & Kasle, 2011). This paper replicates and extends these findings, hypothesizing that individual differences in negative emotionality are associated with frequency of spontaneous sighing. Study 1 (N = 320) documents a strong lay assumption that frequent sighing signals dispositional negative emotionality. Study 2 estimates the actual association between daily sighing, assessed naturalistically using the Electronically Activated Recorder (EAR), and negative emotionality in a large, diverse, pooled sample (N = 469). Bayesian tests across six measures (neuroticism, depression, anxiety, stress, fatigue, loneliness) strongly support the null model. Together, results suggest the common intuition that people who sigh frequently experience more negative emotionality is inaccurate. Assessing whether an individual sighs more (or less) than others cannot be used to infer that they experience more negative emotions.
KW - Depression
KW - Electronically activated recorder
KW - Emotion
KW - Mobile sensing
KW - Sighing
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85098939476&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85098939476&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jrp.2020.104046
DO - 10.1016/j.jrp.2020.104046
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85098939476
SN - 0092-6566
VL - 90
JO - Journal of Research in Personality
JF - Journal of Research in Personality
M1 - 104046
ER -