Abstract
Virtue ethics has a very long history - longer than any other tradition in moral philosophy - stretching back to the ancient Greek philosophers and, a world away, ancient Chinese philosophers as well. Its central concepts are the excellences of character, such as fairness, courage, and self-control, and it focuses on how such excellences help us live good lives, treat ourselves and others well, and share thriving communities. What makes virtue ethics different from other approaches in moral philosophy? One way to answer that question would be to point out the distinctive way that it treats the notion of rightness: right action, in virtue ethics, can be understood only with the aid of an account of the virtues, which in turn can be understood independently of right action (see Watson 1990; Hursthouse 1999, chap. 1; D. Russell 2009, chap. 2). The trouble with this answer, though, is that it is so very broad, and there is enormous diversity among virtue ethicists as to how the relation between rightness and virtue might be made more precise (see van Zyl, this volume). More than that, virtue ethicists disagree over how important the notion of “right action” is in the first place (see the chapters by Chappell and Swanton in this volume).
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Title of host publication | The Cambridge Companion to |
Subtitle of host publication | Virtue Ethics |
Publisher | Cambridge University Press |
Pages | 1-6 |
Number of pages | 6 |
ISBN (Electronic) | 9780511734786 |
ISBN (Print) | 9781107001169 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jan 1 2010 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Arts and Humanities