Internal versus external: Oral-motor performance as a function of attentional focus

Skott E. Freedman, Edwin Maas, Michael P. Caligiuri, Gabriele Wulf, Donald A. Robin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

38 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: Previous studies (e.g., G. Wulf, M. Höß, & W. Prinz, 1998; G. Wulf, B. Lauterbach, & T. Toole, 1999; for a review, see G. Wulf & W. Prinz, 2001) have reported that limb motor performance is enhanced when individuals adopt an external focus (focusing on the effect of the movement) versus an internal focus of attention (focusing on body parts such as the muscles of the hand). This study tested the hypothesis that the effects of attentional focus on limb performance would also occur in the oral-facial system. Method: Two groups of 23 participants were administered both hand and tongue impulse force control tasks in which each group was randomly assigned either an internal or an external focus of attention. Participants were required to exert rapid pressure bursts to achieve a target force level of 20% of their maximal strength. Results: Consistent with limb studies, findings revealed a significant advantage of an external focus (greater accuracy, less variability) for both the hand and tongue control tasks, as opposed to an internal focus of attention. Conclusions: Results are discussed relative to a constrained-action theory of motor control and future application to speech motor learning.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)131-136
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
Volume50
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2007
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Constrained action hypothesis
  • Focus of attention
  • Oral-motor
  • Speech motor control

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Speech and Hearing

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Internal versus external: Oral-motor performance as a function of attentional focus'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this