Integrated development environments: technological and behavioral productivity perceptions

Ronald J. Norman, Jay F. Nunamaker

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

An empirical study of computer-aided software-engineering (CASE) technology productivity perceptions of information systems professionals. In a PC-based survey fifteen CASE technological functions were compared along with two behavioral functions using the method of paired comparison. A rank ordering of the results revealed that data-flow diagramming and the data dictionary maintenance technological functions were perceived to most improve the respondent's productivity over comparable manual methods. Two behavioral functions, communication with other team members and adherence to the enterprise's information systems development standards, were regarded as providing significantly less productivity improvement compared to 47.75% of the other stimuli or significantly more productivity improvement compared to 47.75% of the other stimuli, respectively is described.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationProceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on System Science
EditorsBruce D. Shriver
PublisherPubl by Western Periodicals Co
Pages996-1003
Number of pages8
ISBN (Print)0818619120
StatePublished - 1989
Externally publishedYes
EventProceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences: Software Track - Kailua-Kona, Hawaii, USA
Duration: Jan 3 1989Jan 6 1989

Publication series

NameProceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on System Science
Volume2
ISSN (Print)0073-1129

Other

OtherProceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences: Software Track
CityKailua-Kona, Hawaii, USA
Period1/3/891/6/89

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Computer Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Integrated development environments: technological and behavioral productivity perceptions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this