TY - JOUR
T1 - Institutional and structural barriers to HIV testing
T2 - Elements for a theoretical framework
AU - Meyerson, Beth
AU - Barnes, Priscilla
AU - Emetu, Roberta
AU - Bailey, Marlon
AU - Ohmit, Anita
AU - Gillespie, Anthony
PY - 2014/1/1
Y1 - 2014/1/1
N2 - Stigma is a barrier to HIV health seeking, but little is known about institutional and structural expressions of stigma in HIV testing. This study examines evidence of institutional and structural stigma in the HIV testing process. A qualitative, grounded theory study was conducted using secondary data from a 2011 HIV test site evaluation data in a Midwestern, moderate HIV incidence state. Expressions of structural and institutional stigma were found with over half of the testing sites and at three stages of the HIV testing visit. Examples of structural stigma included social geography, organization, and staff behavior at first encounter and reception, and staff behavior when experiencing the actual HIV test. Institutional stigma was socially expressed through staff behavior at entry/reception and when experiencing the HIV test. The emerging elements demonstrate the potential compounding of stigma experiences with deleterious effect. Study findings may inform future development of a theoretical framework. In practice, findings can guide organizations seeking to reduce HIV testing barriers, as they provide a window into how test seekers experience HIV test sites at first encounter, entry/reception, and at testing stages; and can identify how stigma might be intensified by structural and institutional expressions.
AB - Stigma is a barrier to HIV health seeking, but little is known about institutional and structural expressions of stigma in HIV testing. This study examines evidence of institutional and structural stigma in the HIV testing process. A qualitative, grounded theory study was conducted using secondary data from a 2011 HIV test site evaluation data in a Midwestern, moderate HIV incidence state. Expressions of structural and institutional stigma were found with over half of the testing sites and at three stages of the HIV testing visit. Examples of structural stigma included social geography, organization, and staff behavior at first encounter and reception, and staff behavior when experiencing the actual HIV test. Institutional stigma was socially expressed through staff behavior at entry/reception and when experiencing the HIV test. The emerging elements demonstrate the potential compounding of stigma experiences with deleterious effect. Study findings may inform future development of a theoretical framework. In practice, findings can guide organizations seeking to reduce HIV testing barriers, as they provide a window into how test seekers experience HIV test sites at first encounter, entry/reception, and at testing stages; and can identify how stigma might be intensified by structural and institutional expressions.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84892661408&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84892661408&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1089/apc.2013.0238
DO - 10.1089/apc.2013.0238
M3 - Article
C2 - 24313812
AN - SCOPUS:84892661408
SN - 1087-2914
VL - 28
SP - 22
EP - 27
JO - AIDS Patient Care and STDs
JF - AIDS Patient Care and STDs
IS - 1
ER -