Abstract
When both practitioners and theorists apply Sharpe's diagonal model [15] to simplify the portfolio selection problem, they assume that the entire covariation structure of each stock (i.e., with all other stocks) is captured in that stock's covariance with the market (or β). Furthermore, it is well known that the selection algorithm itself has a marked tendency to select stocks with the lowest βs, ceteris paribus. When a stock's β is statistically indistinguishable from zero, it is an empirical issue whether the market model is (a) less appropriate for that particular stock relative to those with statistically significant βs; or is (b) a viable model in that the covariance of this stock's rate‐of‐return with all other stocks' rates‐of‐return vanishes. The objective of this paper is to distinguish empirically between (a) and (b), and to propose a heuristic which will improve the ex‐post performance of the diagonal model. The possible benefits of this heuristic are also demonstrated in a rigorous statistical framework.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 853-861 |
Number of pages | 9 |
Journal | Decision Sciences |
Volume | 21 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Dec 1990 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Portfolio Analysis
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Business, Management and Accounting
- Strategy and Management
- Information Systems and Management
- Management of Technology and Innovation