TY - JOUR
T1 - Initial experience of left bundle branch area pacing using stylet-driven pacing leads
T2 - A multicenter study
AU - De Pooter, Jan
AU - Ozpak, Emine
AU - Calle, Simon
AU - Peytchev, Peter
AU - Heggermont, Ward
AU - Marchandise, Sebastien
AU - Provenier, Frank
AU - Francois, Bart
AU - Anné, Wim
AU - Pollet, Peter
AU - Barbraud, Cynthia
AU - Gillis, Kris
AU - Timmermans, Frank
AU - Van Heuverswyn, Frederic
AU - Tung, Roderick
AU - Wauters, Aurélien
AU - le Polain de Waroux, Jean Benoit
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
PY - 2022/7
Y1 - 2022/7
N2 - Background: Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) has been performed exclusively using lumen-less pacing leads (LLL) with fixed helix design. This registry study explores the safety and feasibility of LBBAP using stylet-driven leads (SDL) with extendable helix design in a multicenter patient population. Methods: This study prospectively enrolled consecutive patients who underwent LBBAP for bradycardia pacing or heart failure indications at eight Belgian hospitals. LBBAP was attempted using SDL (Solia S60; Biotronik) delivered through dedicated delivery sheath (Selectra3D). Implant success, complications, procedural, and pacing characteristics were recorded at implant and follow-up. Results: The study enrolled 353 patients (mean age 76 ± 39 years, 43% female). The mean number of implants per center was 25 (range: 5–162). Overall, LBBAP with SDL was successful in 334/353 (94%), varying from 93% to 100% among centers. Pacing response was labeled as left bundle branch pacing in 73%, whereas 27% were labeled as myocardial capture. Mean paced QRS duration and stimulus to left ventricular activation time measured 126 ± 21 ms and 74 ± 17. SDL-LBBAP resulted in low pacing thresholds (0.6 ± 0.4 V at 0.4 ms), which remained stable at 12 months follow-up (0.7 ± 0.3, p =.291). Lead revisions for SDL-LBBAP occurred in 5 (1.4%) patients occurred during a mean follow up of 9 ± 5 months. Five (1.4%) septal coronary artery fistulas and 8 (2%) septal perforations occurred, none of them causing persistent ventricular septal defects. Conclusion: The use of SDL to achieve LBBAP is safe and feasible, characterized by high implant success in low and high volume centers, low complication rates, and stable low pacing thresholds.
AB - Background: Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) has been performed exclusively using lumen-less pacing leads (LLL) with fixed helix design. This registry study explores the safety and feasibility of LBBAP using stylet-driven leads (SDL) with extendable helix design in a multicenter patient population. Methods: This study prospectively enrolled consecutive patients who underwent LBBAP for bradycardia pacing or heart failure indications at eight Belgian hospitals. LBBAP was attempted using SDL (Solia S60; Biotronik) delivered through dedicated delivery sheath (Selectra3D). Implant success, complications, procedural, and pacing characteristics were recorded at implant and follow-up. Results: The study enrolled 353 patients (mean age 76 ± 39 years, 43% female). The mean number of implants per center was 25 (range: 5–162). Overall, LBBAP with SDL was successful in 334/353 (94%), varying from 93% to 100% among centers. Pacing response was labeled as left bundle branch pacing in 73%, whereas 27% were labeled as myocardial capture. Mean paced QRS duration and stimulus to left ventricular activation time measured 126 ± 21 ms and 74 ± 17. SDL-LBBAP resulted in low pacing thresholds (0.6 ± 0.4 V at 0.4 ms), which remained stable at 12 months follow-up (0.7 ± 0.3, p =.291). Lead revisions for SDL-LBBAP occurred in 5 (1.4%) patients occurred during a mean follow up of 9 ± 5 months. Five (1.4%) septal coronary artery fistulas and 8 (2%) septal perforations occurred, none of them causing persistent ventricular septal defects. Conclusion: The use of SDL to achieve LBBAP is safe and feasible, characterized by high implant success in low and high volume centers, low complication rates, and stable low pacing thresholds.
KW - left bundle branch area pacing
KW - left ventricular septal pacing
KW - physiologic pacing
KW - stylet-driven pacing leads
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85131253121&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85131253121&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/jce.15558
DO - 10.1111/jce.15558
M3 - Article
C2 - 35598298
AN - SCOPUS:85131253121
SN - 1045-3873
VL - 33
SP - 1540
EP - 1549
JO - Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology
JF - Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology
IS - 7
ER -