TY - JOUR
T1 - Infants' discrimination of consonant contrasts in the presence and absence of talker variability
AU - Quam, Carolyn
AU - Clough, Lauren
AU - Knight, Sara
AU - Gerken, Lou Ann
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank the parents and infants who graciously participated in this study. We also thank members of the Tweety Language Development Lab at the University of Arizona, including Joleen Kuzdas and Leah Mann, who recruited and tested participants. We thank members of the linguistics department at the University of Arizona who served as voices for Experiment 2: Natasha Warner, Jessamyn Schertz, Diane Ohala, and Maureen Hoffman (Dr. Warner and Dr. Schertz also provided phonetics consultations). Several members of the Center for Research in Language at UC San Diego served as voices for Experiment 1. We are grateful to members of the Child Language Learning Center at Portland State University, including Aminah Kariye, Eliza Minculescu, Rachel Atkinson, Anna Zhen, Josie Johnson, Abigail Tolomei, Liz Bort, and Molly Franz, who conducted reliability coding or otherwise assisted with manuscript preparation. Finally, we thank Rebecca Gómez and members of the Tigger Child Cognition Lab, particularly Courtney Meola and Elizabeth Salvagio Campbell, for support with participant recruitment. Funding was provided by NIH grant F32HD065382 to CQ and NSF grant 0950601 to LAG. The authors declare no conflicts of interest with regard to the funding sources for this study.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 International Congress of Infant Studies
PY - 2021/1
Y1 - 2021/1
N2 - To learn speech-sound categories, infants must identify the acoustic dimensions that differentiate categories and selectively attend to them as opposed to irrelevant dimensions. Variability on irrelevant acoustic dimensions can aid formation of robust categories in infants through adults in tasks such as word learning (e.g., Rost and McMurray, 2009) or speech-sound learning (e.g., Lively et al., 1993). At the same time, variability sometimes overwhelms learners, interfering with learning and processing. Two prior studies (Kuhl & Miller, 1982; Jusczyk, Pisoni, & Mullennix, 1992) found that irrelevant variability sometimes impaired early sound discrimination. We asked whether variability would impair or facilitate discrimination for older infants, comparing 7.5-month-old infants' discrimination of an early acquired native contrast, /p/ vs. /b/ (in the word forms /pIm/ vs. /bIm/), in Experiment 1, with an acoustically subtle, non-native contrast, /n/ vs. /ŋ/ (in /nIm/ vs. /ŋIm/), in Experiment 2. Words were spoken by one or four talkers. Infants discriminated the native but not the non-native contrast, and there were no significant effects of talker condition. We discuss implications for theories of phonological learning and avenues for future research.
AB - To learn speech-sound categories, infants must identify the acoustic dimensions that differentiate categories and selectively attend to them as opposed to irrelevant dimensions. Variability on irrelevant acoustic dimensions can aid formation of robust categories in infants through adults in tasks such as word learning (e.g., Rost and McMurray, 2009) or speech-sound learning (e.g., Lively et al., 1993). At the same time, variability sometimes overwhelms learners, interfering with learning and processing. Two prior studies (Kuhl & Miller, 1982; Jusczyk, Pisoni, & Mullennix, 1992) found that irrelevant variability sometimes impaired early sound discrimination. We asked whether variability would impair or facilitate discrimination for older infants, comparing 7.5-month-old infants' discrimination of an early acquired native contrast, /p/ vs. /b/ (in the word forms /pIm/ vs. /bIm/), in Experiment 1, with an acoustically subtle, non-native contrast, /n/ vs. /ŋ/ (in /nIm/ vs. /ŋIm/), in Experiment 2. Words were spoken by one or four talkers. Infants discriminated the native but not the non-native contrast, and there were no significant effects of talker condition. We discuss implications for theories of phonological learning and avenues for future research.
KW - infancy
KW - phonetics
KW - sound discrimination
KW - speech perception
KW - variability
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85092583763&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85092583763&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/infa.12371
DO - 10.1111/infa.12371
M3 - Article
C2 - 33063948
AN - SCOPUS:85092583763
SN - 1525-0008
VL - 26
SP - 84
EP - 103
JO - Infancy
JF - Infancy
IS - 1
ER -