INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES AND PERCEPTUAL DEFENSE IN THE ABSENCE OF RESPONSE BIAS

RICHARD R. BOOTZIN; MARK W. STEPHENS

doi:10.1037/h0024844

INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES AND PERCEPTUAL DEFENSE IN THE ABSENCE OF RESPONSE BIAS

RICHARD R. BOOTZIN, MARK W. STEPHENS

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

40 COLLEGE STUDENTS PARTICIPATED IN A TACHISTOSCOPIC PERCEPTUAL RECOGNITION TASK. A FORCED-CHOICE PROCEDURE WAS USED WHICH MINIMIZED THE EFFECT OF RESPONSE BIASES UPON PERCEPTUAL ACCURACY. AFFECTIVE CONNOTATIONS OF THE STIMULI (RANDOM FORMS) WERE ESTABLISHED THROUGH SUCCESS-FAILURE MANIPULATIONS. ALL SS WERE GIVEN A PERSONALITY-TEST BATTERY IN ORDER TO IDENTIFY REPRESSORS AND SENSITIZERS. ALTHOUGH SPECIFIC HYPOTHESES WERE NOT CONFIRMED, ADDITIONAL SUPPORT WAS OBTAINED FOR THE MORE GENERAL HYPOTHESIS THAT THE AFFECT OF A STIMULUS INFLUENCES ITS PERCEPTIBILITY. A PERCEPTUAL SENSITIZATION EFFECT WAS MANIFEST FOR THE 1ST 1/3 OF THE EXPERIMENT. THE PERSONALITY SCALES FAILED, HOWEVER, TO PREDICT INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES WITH RESPECT TO THIS EFFECT. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	408-412
Number of pages	5
Journal	Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Volume	6
Issue number	4 PART 1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1037/h0024844
State	Published - Aug 1967
Externally published	Yes

Keywords

PERCEPTUAL DEFENSE, TACHISTOSCOPIC PERCEPTUAL RECOGNITION TASK
REPRESSION-SENSITIZATION SCALE &

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Social Psychology
Sociology and Political Science

Access to Document

10.1037/h0024844

Cite this

@article{4f0f5dbab59144b6b60103b00effd2e9,

title = "INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES AND PERCEPTUAL DEFENSE IN THE ABSENCE OF RESPONSE BIAS",

abstract = "40 COLLEGE STUDENTS PARTICIPATED IN A TACHISTOSCOPIC PERCEPTUAL RECOGNITION TASK. A FORCED-CHOICE PROCEDURE WAS USED WHICH MINIMIZED THE EFFECT OF RESPONSE BIASES UPON PERCEPTUAL ACCURACY. AFFECTIVE CONNOTATIONS OF THE STIMULI (RANDOM FORMS) WERE ESTABLISHED THROUGH SUCCESS-FAILURE MANIPULATIONS. ALL SS WERE GIVEN A PERSONALITY-TEST BATTERY IN ORDER TO IDENTIFY REPRESSORS AND SENSITIZERS. ALTHOUGH SPECIFIC HYPOTHESES WERE NOT CONFIRMED, ADDITIONAL SUPPORT WAS OBTAINED FOR THE MORE GENERAL HYPOTHESIS THAT THE AFFECT OF A STIMULUS INFLUENCES ITS PERCEPTIBILITY. A PERCEPTUAL SENSITIZATION EFFECT WAS MANIFEST FOR THE 1ST 1/3 OF THE EXPERIMENT. THE PERSONALITY SCALES FAILED, HOWEVER, TO PREDICT INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES WITH RESPECT TO THIS EFFECT. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).",

keywords = "PERCEPTUAL DEFENSE, TACHISTOSCOPIC PERCEPTUAL RECOGNITION TASK, REPRESSION-SENSITIZATION SCALE &",

author = "BOOTZIN, {RICHARD R.} and STEPHENS, {MARK W.}",

year = "1967",

month = aug,

doi = "10.1037/h0024844",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "6",

pages = "408--412",

journal = "Journal of Personality and Social Psychology",

issn = "0022-3514",

publisher = "American Psychological Association",

number = "4 PART 1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES AND PERCEPTUAL DEFENSE IN THE ABSENCE OF RESPONSE BIAS

AU - BOOTZIN, RICHARD R.

AU - STEPHENS, MARK W.

PY - 1967/8

Y1 - 1967/8

N2 - 40 COLLEGE STUDENTS PARTICIPATED IN A TACHISTOSCOPIC PERCEPTUAL RECOGNITION TASK. A FORCED-CHOICE PROCEDURE WAS USED WHICH MINIMIZED THE EFFECT OF RESPONSE BIASES UPON PERCEPTUAL ACCURACY. AFFECTIVE CONNOTATIONS OF THE STIMULI (RANDOM FORMS) WERE ESTABLISHED THROUGH SUCCESS-FAILURE MANIPULATIONS. ALL SS WERE GIVEN A PERSONALITY-TEST BATTERY IN ORDER TO IDENTIFY REPRESSORS AND SENSITIZERS. ALTHOUGH SPECIFIC HYPOTHESES WERE NOT CONFIRMED, ADDITIONAL SUPPORT WAS OBTAINED FOR THE MORE GENERAL HYPOTHESIS THAT THE AFFECT OF A STIMULUS INFLUENCES ITS PERCEPTIBILITY. A PERCEPTUAL SENSITIZATION EFFECT WAS MANIFEST FOR THE 1ST 1/3 OF THE EXPERIMENT. THE PERSONALITY SCALES FAILED, HOWEVER, TO PREDICT INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES WITH RESPECT TO THIS EFFECT. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

AB - 40 COLLEGE STUDENTS PARTICIPATED IN A TACHISTOSCOPIC PERCEPTUAL RECOGNITION TASK. A FORCED-CHOICE PROCEDURE WAS USED WHICH MINIMIZED THE EFFECT OF RESPONSE BIASES UPON PERCEPTUAL ACCURACY. AFFECTIVE CONNOTATIONS OF THE STIMULI (RANDOM FORMS) WERE ESTABLISHED THROUGH SUCCESS-FAILURE MANIPULATIONS. ALL SS WERE GIVEN A PERSONALITY-TEST BATTERY IN ORDER TO IDENTIFY REPRESSORS AND SENSITIZERS. ALTHOUGH SPECIFIC HYPOTHESES WERE NOT CONFIRMED, ADDITIONAL SUPPORT WAS OBTAINED FOR THE MORE GENERAL HYPOTHESIS THAT THE AFFECT OF A STIMULUS INFLUENCES ITS PERCEPTIBILITY. A PERCEPTUAL SENSITIZATION EFFECT WAS MANIFEST FOR THE 1ST 1/3 OF THE EXPERIMENT. THE PERSONALITY SCALES FAILED, HOWEVER, TO PREDICT INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES WITH RESPECT TO THIS EFFECT. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

KW - PERCEPTUAL DEFENSE, TACHISTOSCOPIC PERCEPTUAL RECOGNITION TASK

KW - REPRESSION-SENSITIZATION SCALE &

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0014119791&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0014119791&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/h0024844

DO - 10.1037/h0024844

M3 - Article

C2 - 6082468

AN - SCOPUS:0014119791

SN - 0022-3514

VL - 6

SP - 408

EP - 412

JO - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

IS - 4 PART 1

ER -

INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES AND PERCEPTUAL DEFENSE IN THE ABSENCE OF RESPONSE BIAS

Abstract

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this