Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Indications and immediate patient outcomes of pathology intraoperative consultations: A College of American Pathologists/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Outcomes Working Group Study

  • Richard J. Zarbo
  • , Waldemar A. Schmidt
  • , Paul Bachner
  • , Peter J. Howanitz
  • , Frederick A. Meier
  • , Ron B. Schifman
  • , D. Joe Boone
  • , Ross M. Herron

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objective. - To evaluate the reasons (indications) for and immediate intraoperative surgical results (outcomes) associated with pathology intraoperative consultation. Design. - In 1992 and 1993, surgeons collaborated with pathologists in 472 voluntarily participating institutions from the United States (462), Canada (7), Australia (2), and New Zealand (1) in a study jointly sponsored by the College of American Pathologists and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Pathologists selected 20 consecutive intraoperative consultations and assembled a cover letter, a checklist questionnaire, and a copy of the corresponding surgical pathology report, all of which were sent to the surgeon(s) for retrospective evaluation. Participants. - The study was distributed to participants in the College of American Pathologists voluntary Q-Probes quality improvement and Surgical Pathology Performance Improvement programs and to Canadian and Australian hospitals with more than 200 beds. Results. - Evaluation of 9164 cases established the five most common indications for intraoperative consultation: (1) establish or confirm diagnosis to determine type or extent of operation (51%), (2) confirm adequacy of margins (16%), (3) confirm nature of tissue to direct sampling for immediate culture or other laboratory study (10%), (4) expedite obtaining diagnosis to inform family or patient (8%), and (5) confirm sufficient tissue submitted to secure diagnosis in permanent section (8%). The information provided by the intraoperative consultation resulted in changed surgical procedures that were either modified, terminated, or newly initiated in 47%, 30%, 6%, 9%, and 28% of cases, corresponding respectively to each of the above five common indications. Rarely cited reasons for intraoperative consultation were to expedite obtaining diagnosis for surgeon's knowledge (3%), to facilitate patient management, other professional communication or discharge planning prior to permanent section availability (3%), academic protocol (<1%), and consultation not needed or no reason for request (<1%). Conclusions. - This multi-institutional, interdisciplinary database confirms that pathology intraoperative consultations, regardless of the initial indications, influence immediate patient care decisions, resulting in changed surgical procedures in an average of 39% of all operative cases.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)19-25
Number of pages7
JournalArchives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine
Volume120
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jan 1996

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Medical Laboratory Technology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Indications and immediate patient outcomes of pathology intraoperative consultations: A College of American Pathologists/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Outcomes Working Group Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this