Indication of a Lombard vocal response in the St. Lawrence River beluga

P. M. Scheifele, S. Andrew, R. A. Cooper, M. Darre, F. E. Musiek, L. Max

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

118 Scopus citations

Abstract

Noise pollution is recognized as a potential danger to marine mammals in general, and to the St. Lawrence beluga in particular. One method of determining the impacts of noise on an animal's communication is to observe a natural and repeatable response of the vocal system to variations in noise level. This is accomplished by observing intensity changes in animal vocalizations in response to environmental noise. One such response observed in humans, songbirds, and some primates is the Lombard vocal response. This response represents a vocal system reaction manifested by changes in vocalization level in direct response to changes in the noise field. In this research, a population of belugas in the St. Lawrence River Estuary was tested to determine whether a Lombard response existed by using hidden Markhov-classified vocalizations as targets for acoustical analyses. Correlation and regression analyses of signals and noise indicated that the phenomenon does exist. Further, results of human subjects experiments [Egan, J. J. (1966), Ph.D. dissertation; Scheifele, P. M. (2003), Ph.D. dissertation], along with previously reported data from other animal species, are similar to those exhibited by the belugas. Overall, findings suggest that typical noise levels in the St. Lawrence River Estuary have a detectable effect on the communication of the beluga.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1486-1492
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of the Acoustical Society of America
Volume117
Issue number3 I
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2005
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Indication of a Lombard vocal response in the St. Lawrence River beluga'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this