INCIVILITY IN 2020 PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE SOCIAL MEDIA POSTS AND POSTS THAT CITE THEM

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

This chapter explores the presence of incivility via name-calling and vulgarity in 2020 presidential primary candidate tweets and the quote tweets reacting to them. Between August 1, 2019 and August 31, 2020, four Republican and 29 Democratic presidential primary candidates made 78,149 tweets, and incivility was not uncommon. Name-calling (8.9%) took place more than often vulgarity did (2.1%) in candidate tweets. Party and candidate differences in the use of incivility were detected. Republicans were more likely to name-call and use vulgarity than Democrats were. While Trump was a notable contributor to name-calling, he was not the sole Republican contributor to it, and he rarely used language identified as vulgar. Public reactions to candidate tweets were more likely to contain incivility than candidate tweets were. The presence of incivility in quote tweets was associated with the presence of incivility in the candidate tweets, suggesting that political candidates have the power to shape how members of the public choose to express themselves.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationSocial Media Politics
Subtitle of host publicationDigital Discord in the 2020 Presidential Election
PublisherTaylor and Francis
Pages44-62
Number of pages19
ISBN (Electronic)9781003836742
ISBN (Print)9781032525655
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2024

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Social Sciences

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'INCIVILITY IN 2020 PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE SOCIAL MEDIA POSTS AND POSTS THAT CITE THEM'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this