TY - JOUR
T1 - Improving Snow Water Equivalent Maps With Machine Learning of Snow Survey and Lidar Measurements
AU - Broxton, Patrick D.
AU - van Leeuwen, Willem J.D.
AU - Biederman, Joel A.
N1 - Funding Information:
This research is supported by a grant from the Salt River Project (SRP) Agricultural Improvement and Power District in Tempe, Arizona. Gridded data sets used in this study are derived from a snow-free lidar acquisition for the Four Forests Restoration Initiative (4Fri) and Snow-on lidar acquisitions acquired through funding by SRP (listed in the references). The 4Fri lidar data can be requested directly from the National Forest Service (https://www.fs.usda.gov/4fri), subject to a nondisclosure agreement to protect cultural resources. All data used to construct and evaluate the models in this study (including field measurement data, snow-on lidar measurement data, and extracted physiographic attribute data) can be accessed in the supplemental data sets. We would like to thank the many volunteers from the NRCS, USFS, USDA-ARS, University of Arizona, and SRP who helped with our field data collections. Finally, we thank Kyle Hartfield at the Arizona Remote Sensing Center for providing geographic information system (GIS) support, as well as those who provided peer-review feedback that greatly improved this manuscript.
Publisher Copyright:
©2019. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.
PY - 2019/5
Y1 - 2019/5
N2 - In the semiarid interior western USA, where a majority of surface water supply comes from mountain forests, high-resolution aerial lidar-based surveys are commonly used to study snow. These surveys provide rich information about snow depth, but they are usually not accompanied with spatially explicit measurements of snow density, which leads to uncertainty in the estimation of snow water equivalent (SWE). In this study, we use a novel approach to distribute ~300 field measurements of snow density with artificial neural networks. We combine the resulting density maps with aerial lidar snow depth measurements, bias corrected with a very large and precisely geolocated array of field-measured snow depths (~4,000 observations), to create and validate maps of snow depth, snow density, and SWE over two sites along Arizona's Mogollon Rim in February and March 2017. These maps show differences between midwinter and late-winter snow conditions. In particular, compared to that of snow depth, the spatial variability of snow density is smaller for the later snow survey than the earlier snow survey. These gridded data also show that the representativeness of Snow Telemetry and other point measurements is different for the midwinter and late-winter snow surveys. Overall, the lidar artificial neural network SWE estimates can be as much as 30% different than if Snow Telemetry density were used with lidar snow depths to estimate SWE.
AB - In the semiarid interior western USA, where a majority of surface water supply comes from mountain forests, high-resolution aerial lidar-based surveys are commonly used to study snow. These surveys provide rich information about snow depth, but they are usually not accompanied with spatially explicit measurements of snow density, which leads to uncertainty in the estimation of snow water equivalent (SWE). In this study, we use a novel approach to distribute ~300 field measurements of snow density with artificial neural networks. We combine the resulting density maps with aerial lidar snow depth measurements, bias corrected with a very large and precisely geolocated array of field-measured snow depths (~4,000 observations), to create and validate maps of snow depth, snow density, and SWE over two sites along Arizona's Mogollon Rim in February and March 2017. These maps show differences between midwinter and late-winter snow conditions. In particular, compared to that of snow depth, the spatial variability of snow density is smaller for the later snow survey than the earlier snow survey. These gridded data also show that the representativeness of Snow Telemetry and other point measurements is different for the midwinter and late-winter snow surveys. Overall, the lidar artificial neural network SWE estimates can be as much as 30% different than if Snow Telemetry density were used with lidar snow depths to estimate SWE.
KW - Artificial Neural Network
KW - LiDAR
KW - SWE
KW - Snow Density
KW - Snow Survey
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065244412&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85065244412&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1029/2018WR024146
DO - 10.1029/2018WR024146
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85065244412
SN - 0043-1397
VL - 55
SP - 3739
EP - 3757
JO - Water Resources Research
JF - Water Resources Research
IS - 5
ER -