Abstract
Lagging other components, project-induced resettlement rarely, if ever, is completed after those resettled are compensated and replacement infrastructure handed-over. Initiating livelihood restoration programs may jumpstart but fall short of re-articulating dismantled local economies. Successful resettlement requires pre- and post-relocation actions that will help resellers and their hosts re-articulate new routine social and economic arrangements and improve their well-being. This Special Issue examines the distinct challenges of the post-relocation phase of resettlement. During this phase, the resettlement burdens shift from the relocation project to the resettlers, their hosts, and third parties; from individual to collective issues; and from mitigation to development. For decades, China has experienced with a variety of long-term, post-relocation policies, programs and methodologies. The contributors provide a glimpse of an extensive toolkit being crafted for use in this localized context-defined phase. Some are transferable. Others are not. Post-relocation support (PReS) adds value to improving the likelihood of successful outcomes.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 357-365 |
Number of pages | 9 |
Journal | Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal |
Volume | 39 |
Issue number | 5 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 2021 |
Keywords
- Involuntary resettlement
- benefit-sharing (BS)
- development-induced displacement and resettlement (DIDR)
- economics of well-being
- land acquisition
- post-relocation support (PReS)
- post-resettlement support (PRS)
- project affected people (PAP)
- social impact assessment
- social stability risk assessment (SSRA)
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Geography, Planning and Development
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law