Improving CT prediction of treatment response in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma using statistical learning theory

Walker H. Land, Dan Margolis, Ronald Gottlieb, Elizabeth A. Krupinski, Jack Y. Yang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Significant interest exists in establishing radiologic imaging as a valid biomarker for assessing the response of cancer to a variety of treatments. To address this problem, we have chosen to study patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma to learn whether statistical learning theory can improve the performance of radiologists using CT in predicting patient treatment response to therapy compared with the more traditional RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) standard.Results: Predictions of survival after 8 months in 38 patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma using the Support Vector Machine (SVM) technique improved 30% when using additional information compared to WHO (World Health Organization) or RECIST measurements alone. With both Logistic Regression (LR) and SVM, there was no significant difference in performance between WHO and RECIST. The SVM and LR techniques also demonstrated that one radiologist consistently outperformed another.Conclusions: This preliminary research study has demonstrated that SLT algorithms, properly used in a clinical setting, have the potential to address questions and criticisms associated with both RECIST and WHO scoring methods. We also propose that tumor heterogeneity, shape, etc. obtained from CT and/or MRI scans be added to the SLT feature vector for processing.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numberS15
JournalBMC genomics
Volume11
Issue numberSUPPL. 3
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2010

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biotechnology
  • Genetics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Improving CT prediction of treatment response in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma using statistical learning theory'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this