TY - JOUR
T1 - Improved estimation of clay content from water content for soils rich in smectite and kaolinite
AU - Arthur, Emmanuel
AU - Tuller, Markus
AU - Norgaard, Trine
AU - Moldrup, Per
AU - de Jonge, Lis W.
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was financed by VILLUM FONDEN research grant 13162 and Danish Council for Independent Research via the project: Water Vapor Sorption Isotherms as Proxy for Soil Surface Properties DFF -4184-00171 ). We especially thank Dr. Cristine Morgan, formerly of Texas A&M University, The International Soil Reference and Information Centre (ISRIC) and Professor Dr. Eric Van Ranst of Ghent University for providing soil samples for this research.
Funding Information:
This research was financed by VILLUM FONDEN research grant 13162 and Danish Council for Independent Research via the project: Water Vapor Sorption Isotherms as Proxy for Soil Surface Properties DFF -4184-00171). We especially thank Dr. Cristine Morgan, formerly of Texas A&M University, The International Soil Reference and Information Centre (ISRIC) and Professor Dr. Eric Van Ranst of Ghent University for providing soil samples for this research.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2019/9/15
Y1 - 2019/9/15
N2 - Standard measurement methods for soil clay content, including the hydrometer and pipette methods, are laborious and difficult to repeat. This has motivated the application of proxy methods such as estimation of clay content from soil water vapor sorption isotherms. Previous studies have revealed that vapor sorption-based clay estimates are inaccurate for soils dominated by swelling or highly weathered non-swelling clays such as kaolinite. In this study, we evaluate an existing vapor sorption-based clay estimation model for soils dominated by either illite (IL), smectite (SM), or kaolinite (KA) clay minerals, and propose modifications to account for high SM and KA contents. Compared to the pipette method, the clay content obtained from the existing water sorption model at 50% relative humidity (RH) was accurate for the IL samples, but significantly overestimated (RMSE = 23.7%; ME = 19.7%) or underestimated (RMSE = 28.8%; ME = −17.0%) clay content for SM and KA rich soils, respectively. The proposed modification involves correcting the estimated clay content with a “slope factor”, S for RH values ranging from 30 to 90% for both adsorption and desorption. For SM samples, S averaged 0.76 and 0.72 for adsorption and desorption, respectively, and for KA samples, S ranged from 2.26 to 1.19 and followed a polynomial relationship with RH. Comparison of the estimated clay content from the modified models showed markedly improved estimation of the measured clay content (for RH of 90%, RMSE = 8.0%; ME = 2.6% for SM samples and RMSE = 9.6%; ME = −5.7% for KA samples).
AB - Standard measurement methods for soil clay content, including the hydrometer and pipette methods, are laborious and difficult to repeat. This has motivated the application of proxy methods such as estimation of clay content from soil water vapor sorption isotherms. Previous studies have revealed that vapor sorption-based clay estimates are inaccurate for soils dominated by swelling or highly weathered non-swelling clays such as kaolinite. In this study, we evaluate an existing vapor sorption-based clay estimation model for soils dominated by either illite (IL), smectite (SM), or kaolinite (KA) clay minerals, and propose modifications to account for high SM and KA contents. Compared to the pipette method, the clay content obtained from the existing water sorption model at 50% relative humidity (RH) was accurate for the IL samples, but significantly overestimated (RMSE = 23.7%; ME = 19.7%) or underestimated (RMSE = 28.8%; ME = −17.0%) clay content for SM and KA rich soils, respectively. The proposed modification involves correcting the estimated clay content with a “slope factor”, S for RH values ranging from 30 to 90% for both adsorption and desorption. For SM samples, S averaged 0.76 and 0.72 for adsorption and desorption, respectively, and for KA samples, S ranged from 2.26 to 1.19 and followed a polynomial relationship with RH. Comparison of the estimated clay content from the modified models showed markedly improved estimation of the measured clay content (for RH of 90%, RMSE = 8.0%; ME = 2.6% for SM samples and RMSE = 9.6%; ME = −5.7% for KA samples).
KW - Hygroscopic water
KW - Montmorillonite
KW - Soil texture
KW - Vapor sorption
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065704674&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85065704674&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.05.018
DO - 10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.05.018
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85065704674
SN - 0016-7061
VL - 350
SP - 40
EP - 45
JO - Geoderma
JF - Geoderma
ER -