TY - JOUR
T1 - Improved conservation of natural enemies with selective management systems for Bemisia tabaci (Homoptera
T2 - Aleyrodidae) in cotton
AU - Naranjo, Steven E.
AU - Hagler, James R.
AU - Ellsworth, Peter C.
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank T-X Liu (Texas A&M University) and Dan Gerling (Tel Aviv Univ.) for helpful comments on earlier drafts of this manuscript, Bruce Mackey (USDA-ARS, Albany, CA) for advice on statistical analyses, Ivan Kirk and B. Carlton (USDA-ARS, College Station, TX) for assistance with aerial applications, and the Maricopa Agricultural Center Demonstration Farm for plot space and crop production assistance. We also thank Virginia Barkley, Shana England, Stephanie Jones, Dan Langhorst, Scott Machtley, Jeanette Martin, Donna Meade, Gregory Owens and Sally Wright for expert technical assistance. Partial support was provided by USDA-CREES, Pest Management Alternatives Special Projects, NAPIAP (Western Region), Western Region IPM Special Projects, and Cotton Incorporated.
PY - 2003/9
Y1 - 2003/9
N2 - A large-scale study was conducted in 1996 to evaluate and demonstrate strategies for pest management of Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) in cotton involving different insecticide regimes, application methods, and action thresholds. Here we examined the effects of the various management systems on the abundance and activity of native natural enemies. Population densities of 18 out of 20 taxa of arthropod predators were significantly higher in regimes initiated with the insect growth regulators (IGRs) buprofezin (chitin inhibitor) or pyriproxyfen (juvenile hormone analog) compared with a regime dependent on a rotation of conventional, broad-spectrum insecticides. There were no differences in predator density between the two IGR regimes, and generally no effects due to application method or action threshold level. Predator to prey ratios were significantly higher in regimes utilizing the two IGRs compared with the conventional regime, but were unaffected by application method or threshold level. Rates of parasitism by Eretmocerus eremicus Rose and Zolnerowich and Encarsia meritoria Gahan were higher in the IGR regimes compared with the conventional regime, but were unaffected by insecticide application method, or the action threshold used to initiate applications of the IGRs. Results demonstrate the selective action of these two IGRs and suggest that their use may enhance opportunities for conservation biological control in cotton systems affected by B. tabaci, especially relative to conventional insecticide alternatives.
AB - A large-scale study was conducted in 1996 to evaluate and demonstrate strategies for pest management of Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) in cotton involving different insecticide regimes, application methods, and action thresholds. Here we examined the effects of the various management systems on the abundance and activity of native natural enemies. Population densities of 18 out of 20 taxa of arthropod predators were significantly higher in regimes initiated with the insect growth regulators (IGRs) buprofezin (chitin inhibitor) or pyriproxyfen (juvenile hormone analog) compared with a regime dependent on a rotation of conventional, broad-spectrum insecticides. There were no differences in predator density between the two IGR regimes, and generally no effects due to application method or action threshold level. Predator to prey ratios were significantly higher in regimes utilizing the two IGRs compared with the conventional regime, but were unaffected by application method or threshold level. Rates of parasitism by Eretmocerus eremicus Rose and Zolnerowich and Encarsia meritoria Gahan were higher in the IGR regimes compared with the conventional regime, but were unaffected by insecticide application method, or the action threshold used to initiate applications of the IGRs. Results demonstrate the selective action of these two IGRs and suggest that their use may enhance opportunities for conservation biological control in cotton systems affected by B. tabaci, especially relative to conventional insecticide alternatives.
KW - Aphelinid parasitoids
KW - Arthropod predators
KW - Bemisia argentifolii
KW - Bemisia tabaci
KW - Conservation biological control
KW - Insect growth regulators
KW - Principal response curves
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0141634212&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0141634212&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/0958315031000151828
DO - 10.1080/0958315031000151828
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0141634212
SN - 0958-3157
VL - 13
SP - 571
EP - 587
JO - Biocontrol Science and Technology
JF - Biocontrol Science and Technology
IS - 6
ER -