TY - JOUR
T1 - Impact of electronic surveillance on isolation practices
AU - Larson, Elaine
AU - Behta, Maryam
AU - Cohen, Bevin
AU - Jia, Haomiao
AU - Furuya, Yoko
AU - Ross, Barbara
AU - Chaudhry, Rohit
AU - Vawdrey, David K.
AU - Ellingson, Katherine
PY - 2013/7
Y1 - 2013/7
N2 - OBJECTIVE. To assess the impact of an electronic surveillance system on isolation practices and rates of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). DESIGN. A pre-post test intervention. SETTING. Inpatient units (except psychiatry and labor and delivery) in 4 New York City hospitals. PATIENTS. All patients for whom isolation precautions were indicated, May 2009-December 2011. METHODS. Trained observers assessed isolation sign postings, availability of isolation carts, and staff use of personal protective equipment (PPE). Infection rates were obtained from the infection control department. Regression analyses were used to examine the association between the surveillance system, infection prevention practices, and MRSA infection rates. RESULTS. A total of 54,159 isolation days and 7,628 staff opportunities for donning PPE were observed over a 31-month period. Odds of having an appropriate sign posted were significantly higher after intervention than before intervention (odds ratio [OR], 1.10 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.01-1.20]). Relative to baseline, postintervention sign posting improved significantly for airborne and droplet precautions but not for contact precautions. Sign posting improved for vancomycin-resistant enterococci (OR, 1.51 [95% CI, 1.23-1.86]; P = 0001, Clostridium difficile (OR, 1.59 [95% CI, 1.27-2.02]; P = 00005), and Acinetobacter baumannii (OR, 1.41 [95% CI, 1.21-1.64]; P = 00001) precautions but not for MRSA precautions (OR, 1.11 [95% CI, 0.89-1.39]; P = 36). Staff and visitor adherence to PPE remained low throughout the study but improved from 29.1% to 37.0% after the intervention (OR, 1.14 [95% CI, 1.01-1.29]). MRSA infection rates were not significantly different after the intervention. CONCLUSIONS. An electronic surveillance system resulted in small but statistically significant improvements in isolation practices but no reductions in infection rates over the short term. Such innovations likely require considerable uptake time.
AB - OBJECTIVE. To assess the impact of an electronic surveillance system on isolation practices and rates of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). DESIGN. A pre-post test intervention. SETTING. Inpatient units (except psychiatry and labor and delivery) in 4 New York City hospitals. PATIENTS. All patients for whom isolation precautions were indicated, May 2009-December 2011. METHODS. Trained observers assessed isolation sign postings, availability of isolation carts, and staff use of personal protective equipment (PPE). Infection rates were obtained from the infection control department. Regression analyses were used to examine the association between the surveillance system, infection prevention practices, and MRSA infection rates. RESULTS. A total of 54,159 isolation days and 7,628 staff opportunities for donning PPE were observed over a 31-month period. Odds of having an appropriate sign posted were significantly higher after intervention than before intervention (odds ratio [OR], 1.10 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.01-1.20]). Relative to baseline, postintervention sign posting improved significantly for airborne and droplet precautions but not for contact precautions. Sign posting improved for vancomycin-resistant enterococci (OR, 1.51 [95% CI, 1.23-1.86]; P = 0001, Clostridium difficile (OR, 1.59 [95% CI, 1.27-2.02]; P = 00005), and Acinetobacter baumannii (OR, 1.41 [95% CI, 1.21-1.64]; P = 00001) precautions but not for MRSA precautions (OR, 1.11 [95% CI, 0.89-1.39]; P = 36). Staff and visitor adherence to PPE remained low throughout the study but improved from 29.1% to 37.0% after the intervention (OR, 1.14 [95% CI, 1.01-1.29]). MRSA infection rates were not significantly different after the intervention. CONCLUSIONS. An electronic surveillance system resulted in small but statistically significant improvements in isolation practices but no reductions in infection rates over the short term. Such innovations likely require considerable uptake time.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84878760422&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84878760422&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1086/671001
DO - 10.1086/671001
M3 - Article
C2 - 23739073
AN - SCOPUS:84878760422
SN - 0899-823X
VL - 34
SP - 694
EP - 699
JO - Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology
JF - Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology
IS - 7
ER -