TY - JOUR
T1 - “I feel you”
T2 - Greater linkage between friends’ physiological responses and emotional experience is associated with greater empathic accuracy
AU - Zerwas, Felicia K.
AU - Springstein, Tabea
AU - Karnilowicz, Helena R.
AU - Lam, Phoebe
AU - Butler, Emily A.
AU - John, Oliver P.
AU - Mauss, Iris B.
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was supported by National Institutes of Health grant R01AG043592 and National Science Foundation grant BCS-1941868 awarded to I.B.M.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021
PY - 2021/4
Y1 - 2021/4
N2 - How do people come to know others’ feelings? One idea is that affective processes (e.g., physiological responses) play an important role, leading to the prediction that linkage between one's physiological responses and others’ emotions relates to one's ability to know how others feel (i.e., empathic accuracy). Participants (N = 96, 48 female friend pairs) completed a stressful speech task and then provided continuous ratings of their own (as “targets”) and their friend's (as “perceivers”) emotional experience for the video-taped speeches. We measured physiology-physiology linkage (linkage between perceivers’ and targets’ physiology), physiology-experience linkage (linkage between perceivers’ physiology and targets’ experience), and empathic accuracy (linkage between perceivers’ ratings of targets’ experience and targets’ ratings of their experience). Physiology-experience (but not physiology-physiology) linkage was associated with greater empathic accuracy even when controlling for key potential confounds (random linkage, targets’ and perceivers’ emotional reactivity, and relationship closeness). Results suggest that physiological responses play a role in empathic accuracy.
AB - How do people come to know others’ feelings? One idea is that affective processes (e.g., physiological responses) play an important role, leading to the prediction that linkage between one's physiological responses and others’ emotions relates to one's ability to know how others feel (i.e., empathic accuracy). Participants (N = 96, 48 female friend pairs) completed a stressful speech task and then provided continuous ratings of their own (as “targets”) and their friend's (as “perceivers”) emotional experience for the video-taped speeches. We measured physiology-physiology linkage (linkage between perceivers’ and targets’ physiology), physiology-experience linkage (linkage between perceivers’ physiology and targets’ experience), and empathic accuracy (linkage between perceivers’ ratings of targets’ experience and targets’ ratings of their experience). Physiology-experience (but not physiology-physiology) linkage was associated with greater empathic accuracy even when controlling for key potential confounds (random linkage, targets’ and perceivers’ emotional reactivity, and relationship closeness). Results suggest that physiological responses play a role in empathic accuracy.
KW - Empathic accuracy
KW - Empathy
KW - Friends
KW - Physiological linkage
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85103343713&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85103343713&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2021.108079
DO - 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2021.108079
M3 - Article
C2 - 33727107
AN - SCOPUS:85103343713
SN - 0019-493X
VL - 161
JO - Biological Psychology
JF - Biological Psychology
M1 - 108079
ER -