Abstract
The idea of damage assessment based on using a steady-state chaotic excitation and state space embedding, proposed during the recent few years, has led to the development of a computationally feasible health monitoring technique based on comparisons between the geometry of a baseline attractor and a test attractor at some unknown state of health. This study explores an extension to this concept, namely a hyperchaotic excitation. Three different types of Lorenz chaotic/hyperchaotic oscillators are used to provide the excitations and comparisons are made using a prediction error feature called 'nonlinear auto-prediction error', which is based on attractor geometry, to evaluate the efficiency of chaotic excitation versus hyperchaotic ones. An 8-degree-of-freedom system and a cantilever beam are two models that are used for numerical simulation. A comparison between the results from the chaotic excitation with the results from each of the hyperchaotic excitations, obtained for both of the numerical models, highlights the higher sensitivity of a hyperchaotic excitation relative to a chaotic excitation. The experimental results also confirm the numerical results conveying the higher sensitivity of the hyperchaotic excitation compared to the chaotic one. A hyperchaotic excitation having three positive Lyapunov exponents is shown in some cases to be even more sensitive than a two-positive-Lyapunov-exponent hyperchaotic excitation.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 457-473 |
Number of pages | 17 |
Journal | Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing |
Volume | 29 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - May 2012 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Attractor geometry
- Damage identification
- Hyperchaotic excitation
- Prediction error
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Control and Systems Engineering
- Signal Processing
- Civil and Structural Engineering
- Aerospace Engineering
- Mechanical Engineering
- Computer Science Applications