TY - JOUR
T1 - Hydrologic model parameterization using dynamic Landsat-based vegetative estimates within a semiarid grassland
AU - Kautz, Mark A.
AU - Holifield Collins, Chandra D.
AU - Guertin, D. Phillip
AU - Goodrich, David C.
AU - van Leeuwen, Willem J.
AU - Williams, C. Jason
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors would like to thank the staff of the USDA ARS Southwest Watershed Research Center for maintenance of the WGEW. Much appreciation to Shea Burns, Mariano Hernandez, Carl Unkrich, and Haiyan Wei for model expertise and assistance. The authors also wish to thank the three anonymous reviewers whose comments and suggestions helped improve and clarify this manuscript. This work was funded in part by the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Conservation Effects Assessment Project (CEAP). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Mention of a proprietary product does not constitute endorsement by USDA and does not imply its approval to the exclusion of the other products that may also be suitable.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019
PY - 2019/8
Y1 - 2019/8
N2 - The use of hydrologic models to assess long-term watershed condition through repeated simulations of runoff and erosion is one common approach for rangeland health evaluation. However, obtaining vegetative data of appropriate spatiotemporal resolution for model parameterization can be difficult. The goal of this research was to assess the utility of using time-varying, Landsat-derived vegetative values to parameterize an event-based, watershed-scale hydrologic model. This study was conducted on a small, instrumented grassland watershed in the USDA Agricultural Research Service operated Walnut Gulch Experimental Watershed in southeastern, Arizona. Cloud-free Landsat scenes were acquired over the watershed for the years 1996–2014. The Soil Adjusted Total Vegetation Index (SATVI) was calculated for each image and calibrated using ground measured data to produce a time series of satellite-based foliar cover rasters. These values were used to parameterize the Rangeland Hydrology and Erosion Model (RHEM) for 26 rainfall-runoff events with corresponding observed data. Three parameterization scenarios using these data aggregated to different temporal resolutions (static, long-term mean, annual mean, and intra-annual values) were compared to a static literature-based scenario for evaluation. The linear relationship between field-measured foliar cover and SATVI showed statistically significant agreement with R2 = 0.85 and p < 0.05. Simulated runoff volume and peak flow rate using the three remotely sensed parameterization scenarios improved upon that of the literature-based scenario, with the annual mean scenario performing the best of the three temporal aggregations. The methodological framework outlined here provides a means for improved parameterization for watershed-scale modelling where vegetative data may be scarce or unobtainable for long-term analysis.
AB - The use of hydrologic models to assess long-term watershed condition through repeated simulations of runoff and erosion is one common approach for rangeland health evaluation. However, obtaining vegetative data of appropriate spatiotemporal resolution for model parameterization can be difficult. The goal of this research was to assess the utility of using time-varying, Landsat-derived vegetative values to parameterize an event-based, watershed-scale hydrologic model. This study was conducted on a small, instrumented grassland watershed in the USDA Agricultural Research Service operated Walnut Gulch Experimental Watershed in southeastern, Arizona. Cloud-free Landsat scenes were acquired over the watershed for the years 1996–2014. The Soil Adjusted Total Vegetation Index (SATVI) was calculated for each image and calibrated using ground measured data to produce a time series of satellite-based foliar cover rasters. These values were used to parameterize the Rangeland Hydrology and Erosion Model (RHEM) for 26 rainfall-runoff events with corresponding observed data. Three parameterization scenarios using these data aggregated to different temporal resolutions (static, long-term mean, annual mean, and intra-annual values) were compared to a static literature-based scenario for evaluation. The linear relationship between field-measured foliar cover and SATVI showed statistically significant agreement with R2 = 0.85 and p < 0.05. Simulated runoff volume and peak flow rate using the three remotely sensed parameterization scenarios improved upon that of the literature-based scenario, with the annual mean scenario performing the best of the three temporal aggregations. The methodological framework outlined here provides a means for improved parameterization for watershed-scale modelling where vegetative data may be scarce or unobtainable for long-term analysis.
KW - Ecohydrology
KW - KINEROS
KW - Landsat
KW - Rangeland Hydrology and Erosion Model
KW - Remote sensing
KW - Surface runoff
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067260893&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85067260893&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.05.044
DO - 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.05.044
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85067260893
SN - 0022-1694
VL - 575
SP - 1073
EP - 1086
JO - Journal of Hydrology
JF - Journal of Hydrology
ER -