How We Simplify, Circumvent, or Distort Causal Mechanistic Reasoning in Chemistry

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Calls for reform in science and chemistry education emphasize the importance of engaging students in building causal-mechanistic explanations of relevant phenomena. However, mechanistic reasoning (MER) is cognitively taxing and may not be the most productive approach in all types of tasks and contexts. Consequently, it is common for chemistry educators to simplify or circumvent MER when building explanations. This commentary briefly describes and discusses some common MER shortcuts that chemistry educators use and their potential effects on student learning.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1793-1797
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Chemical Education
Volume101
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 4 2024
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • First-Year Undergraduate/General
  • Second-Year Undergraduate/General
  • Student-Centered Learning
  • Upper-Division Undergraduate

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Chemistry
  • Education

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How We Simplify, Circumvent, or Distort Causal Mechanistic Reasoning in Chemistry'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this