Abstract
Calls for reform in science and chemistry education emphasize the importance of engaging students in building causal-mechanistic explanations of relevant phenomena. However, mechanistic reasoning (MER) is cognitively taxing and may not be the most productive approach in all types of tasks and contexts. Consequently, it is common for chemistry educators to simplify or circumvent MER when building explanations. This commentary briefly describes and discusses some common MER shortcuts that chemistry educators use and their potential effects on student learning.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1793-1797 |
Number of pages | 5 |
Journal | Journal of Chemical Education |
Volume | 101 |
Issue number | 5 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - May 4 2024 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- First-Year Undergraduate/General
- Second-Year Undergraduate/General
- Student-Centered Learning
- Upper-Division Undergraduate
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Chemistry
- Education